Engineer B Post-Occupancy Facility Inspection Engineer
R · Role
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#Engineer_B_Post-Occupancy_Facility_Inspection_Engineer
Definition
Retained by the new facility owner to inspect the building's systems; participated in a joint wiring inspection with Engineer A and the city inspector; conducted a further study of plumbing and heating systems; filed a report finding no plumbing design problem but identifying design inadequacies in hot water and heating equipment sizing, recommending higher-capacity equipment.
Properties
Instance of
Post-OccupancyFacilityInspectionEngineer
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Post-OccupancyFacilityInspectionEngineer
Attributes
| license | Professional Engineer |
| specialty | Building systems inspection and evaluation |
| report_author | True |
| retained_by | New Facility Owner |
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Relationships
| type | joint_inspection_participant_with |
| target | City Wiring Inspector |
| type | joint_inspection_participant_with |
| target | Engineer A |
| type | retained_by |
| target | New Facility Owner |
| type | reviewer_of_work_of |
| target | Engineer A |
| type | subject_of_complaint_by |
| target | Engineer A |
Role category
provider_client
Relationships
adheresToPrinciple
Adverse Technical Finding Non-Equivalence to Malicious Reputation Injury Applied to Engineer B Findings, Available Evidence Consultation Satisfied By Joint Wiring Inspection, Honest Disagreement Among Qualified Engineers Permissibility Applied to Engineer B Adverse Findings, Honest Disagreement Permissibility Applied to Engineer B Findings, Objectivity Applied to Engineer B Post-Occupancy Inspection, Objectivity Demonstrated By Engineer B In Balanced Report, Terminated-Connection Peer Review Permissibility Invoked by Engineer B Review of Engineer A Work
hasObligation
Engineer B Adverse Technical Finding Malicious Intent Non-Satisfaction Non-Violation, Engineer B Available Evidence Consultation Satisfied Joint Wiring Inspection, Engineer B Honest Disagreement Permissibility Heating Equipment Sizing Conclusion, Engineer B Joint Inspection Available Evidence Consultation Before Adverse Opinion, Engineer B Joint Wiring Inspection Participation Adverse Opinion Grounding, Engineer B Objective and Complete Reporting Balanced Findings, Engineer B Peer Review Knowledge Requirement Purpose-Limited Interpretation, Engineer B Peer Review Prohibition Interpretation Client Public Interest Non-Subordination, Engineer B Post-Completion Terminated-Relationship Review Without Notification Permissibility, Engineer B Post-Occupancy Inspection Honest Adverse Finding Non-Suppression, Engineer B Post-Occupancy Inspection Honest Adverse Finding Plumbing Heating Report, Engineer B Terminated-Connection Peer Review Notification Exemption Recognition
Source Evidence
Source text
the new owner informed Engineer A he had retained Engineer B to make an engineering inspection of the facility
Text references
Engineer B recommended the installation of equipment of higher capacity
Engineer B thereafter conducted a further study and filed a report with the owner
The report noted there was no problem with the design of the plumbing system, but concluded there were design inadequacies in the original sizing of the equipment for hot water and heating
the new owner informed Engineer A he had retained Engineer B to make an engineering inspection of the facility
TTL
@prefix case169: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case169:Engineer_B_Post-Occupancy_Facility_Inspection_Engineer a proeth:Post-OccupancyFacilityInspectionEngineer,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Post-Occupancy Facility Inspection Engineer" ;
proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple case169:Adverse_Technical_Finding_Non-Equivalence_to_Malicious_Reputation_Injury_Applied_to_Engineer_B_Findings,
case169:Available_Evidence_Consultation_Satisfied_By_Joint_Wiring_Inspection,
case169:Honest_Disagreement_Among_Qualified_Engineers_Permissibility_Applied_to_Engineer_B_Adverse_Findings,
case169:Honest_Disagreement_Permissibility_Applied_to_Engineer_B_Findings,
case169:Objectivity_Applied_to_Engineer_B_Post-Occupancy_Inspection,
case169:Objectivity_Demonstrated_By_Engineer_B_In_Balanced_Report,
case169:Terminated-Connection_Peer_Review_Permissibility_Invoked_by_Engineer_B_Review_of_Engineer_A_Work ;
proeth-core:hasObligation case169:Engineer_B_Adverse_Technical_Finding_Malicious_Intent_Non-Satisfaction_Non-Violation,
case169:Engineer_B_Available_Evidence_Consultation_Satisfied_Joint_Wiring_Inspection,
case169:Engineer_B_Honest_Disagreement_Permissibility_Heating_Equipment_Sizing_Conclusion,
case169:Engineer_B_Joint_Inspection_Available_Evidence_Consultation_Before_Adverse_Opinion,
case169:Engineer_B_Joint_Wiring_Inspection_Participation_Adverse_Opinion_Grounding,
case169:Engineer_B_Objective_and_Complete_Reporting_Balanced_Findings,
case169:Engineer_B_Peer_Review_Knowledge_Requirement_Purpose-Limited_Interpretation,
case169:Engineer_B_Peer_Review_Prohibition_Interpretation_Client_Public_Interest_Non-Subordination,
case169:Engineer_B_Post-Completion_Terminated-Relationship_Review_Without_Notification_Permissibility,
case169:Engineer_B_Post-Occupancy_Inspection_Honest_Adverse_Finding_Non-Suppression,
case169:Engineer_B_Post-Occupancy_Inspection_Honest_Adverse_Finding_Plumbing_Heating_Report,
case169:Engineer_B_Terminated-Connection_Peer_Review_Notification_Exemption_Recognition ;
proeth:attributes "{'license': 'Professional Engineer', 'specialty': 'Building systems inspection and evaluation', 'report_author': True, 'retained_by': 'New Facility Owner'}" ;
proeth:caseinvolvement "Retained by the new facility owner to inspect the building's systems; participated in a joint wiring inspection with Engineer A and the city inspector; conducted a further study of plumbing and heating systems; filed a report finding no plumbing design problem but identifying design inadequacies in hot water and heating equipment sizing, recommending higher-capacity equipment." ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T22:12:39.214476+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T22:12:39.214476+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:relationships "{'type': 'joint_inspection_participant_with', 'target': 'City Wiring Inspector'}",
"{'type': 'joint_inspection_participant_with', 'target': 'Engineer A'}",
"{'type': 'retained_by', 'target': 'New Facility Owner'}",
"{'type': 'reviewer_of_work_of', 'target': 'Engineer A'}",
"{'type': 'subject_of_complaint_by', 'target': 'Engineer A'}" ;
proeth:rolecategory "provider_client" ;
proeth:roleclass "Post-Occupancy Facility Inspection Engineer" ;
proeth:sourcetext "the new owner informed Engineer A he had retained Engineer B to make an engineering inspection of the facility" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer B recommended the installation of equipment of higher capacity",
"Engineer B thereafter conducted a further study and filed a report with the owner",
"The report noted there was no problem with the design of the plumbing system, but concluded there were design inadequacies in the original sizing of the equipment for hot water and heating",
"the new owner informed Engineer A he had retained Engineer B to make an engineering inspection of the facility" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 169 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T22:36:17.035039"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 169 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
169
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T22:12:39.214476+00:00
First case
169
Generated
2026-03-01T22:12:39.214476+00:00
Attributed to
Case 169 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T22:36:17.035039
Generated by
ProEthica Case 169 Extraction