Engineer B Terminated-Connection Peer Review Notification Exemption Recognition
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#Engineer_B_Terminated-Connection_Peer_Review_Notification_Exemption_Recognition
Properties
Instance of
Post-CompletionTerminated-RelationshipReviewWithoutIncumbentNotificationPermissibilityObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Post-CompletionTerminated-RelationshipReviewWithoutIncumbentNotificationPermissibilityObligation
Case context
Engineer A's sub-consultant engagement for MEP design had been fully completed and paid years before Engineer B was retained; Engineer A alleged Engineer B obtained employment by a 'questionable method' of criticizing Engineer A without his knowledge.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.93
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer B (Post-Occupancy Facility Inspection Engineer)
Obligation statement
Engineer B was not obligated to notify Engineer A before commencing the post-occupancy inspection because Engineer A's connection with the project had been terminated years earlier upon full payment and project completion, satisfying the termination exception in Section 12(a).
Temporal scope
At the time Engineer B accepted and commenced the post-occupancy inspection engagement
Source Evidence
Source text
it is equally clear that the connection of Engineer A with the project had been terminated some years earlier
Text references
Engineer A knew that Engineer B had been retained to make an engineer's inspection of the facility and that the resulting evaluation would necessarily entail a review of the original designs
it is equally clear that the connection of Engineer A with the project had been terminated some years earlier
unless the connection of such engineer with the work has been terminated
TTL
@prefix case169: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case169:Engineer_B_Terminated-Connection_Peer_Review_Notification_Exemption_Recognition a proeth:Post-CompletionTerminated-RelationshipReviewWithoutIncumbentNotificationPermissibilityObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Terminated-Connection Peer Review Notification Exemption Recognition" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case169:Engineer_A_Connection_Terminated_Years_Prior_to_Review,
case169:Engineer_A_Original_Design_Completion_and_Payment_State,
case169:Engineer_B_Review_Conducted_With_Engineer_As_Knowledge ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A's sub-consultant engagement for MEP design had been fully completed and paid years before Engineer B was retained; Engineer A alleged Engineer B obtained employment by a 'questionable method' of criticizing Engineer A without his knowledge." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.93" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case169:Terminated-Connection_Peer_Review_Permissibility_Invoked_by_Engineer_B_Review_of_Engineer_A_Work ;
proeth:discoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T22:26:07.553169+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T22:26:07.553169+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer B (Post-Occupancy Facility Inspection Engineer)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Post-Completion Terminated-Relationship Review Without Incumbent Notification Permissibility Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer B was not obligated to notify Engineer A before commencing the post-occupancy inspection because Engineer A's connection with the project had been terminated years earlier upon full payment and project completion, satisfying the termination exception in Section 12(a)." ;
proeth:sourcetext "it is equally clear that the connection of Engineer A with the project had been terminated some years earlier" ;
proeth:temporalscope "At the time Engineer B accepted and commenced the post-occupancy inspection engagement" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A knew that Engineer B had been retained to make an engineer's inspection of the facility and that the resulting evaluation would necessarily entail a review of the original designs",
"it is equally clear that the connection of Engineer A with the project had been terminated some years earlier",
"unless the connection of such engineer with the work has been terminated" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 169 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T22:36:17.049073"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 169 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
169
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T22:26:07.553169+00:00
First case
169
Generated
2026-03-01T22:26:07.553169+00:00
Attributed to
Case 169 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T22:36:17.049073
Generated by
ProEthica Case 169 Extraction