Engineer B Post-Completion Terminated-Relationship Review Without Notification Permissibility
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#Engineer_B_Post-Completion_Terminated-Relationship_Review_Without_Notification_Permissibility
Properties
Instance of
Post-CompletionTerminated-RelationshipReviewWithoutIncumbentNotificationPermissibilityObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Post-CompletionTerminated-RelationshipReviewWithoutIncumbentNotificationPermissibilityObligation
Case context
Engineer A alleged Engineer B obtained employment by a questionable method of criticizing Engineer A without his knowledge; however, Engineer A had been fully paid and the project completed seven years prior, with ownership having since changed.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer B
Obligation statement
Engineer B was not ethically required to notify Engineer A before commencing the post-occupancy inspection, because Engineer A's contractual relationship with the project had been fully completed and terminated through full payment years prior to the review; the NSPE III.8.a notification requirement does not apply to engineers whose connection with the work has been terminated.
Temporal scope
At the time Engineer B commenced the post-occupancy inspection
Relationships
Source Evidence
Source text
The project was completed and occupied four years later, and Engineer A was fully paid for his services.
Text references
Approximately seven years after the original occupancy, ownership of the facility changed.
Engineer A requested the registration board to find Engineer B guilty of 'misconduct' in that Engineer B had obtained employment by a questionable method of criticizing Engineer A without his knowledge
The project was completed and occupied four years later, and Engineer A was fully paid for his services.
TTL
@prefix case169: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case169:Engineer_B_Post-Completion_Terminated-Relationship_Review_Without_Notification_Permissibility a proeth:Post-CompletionTerminated-RelationshipReviewWithoutIncumbentNotificationPermissibilityObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Post-Completion Terminated-Relationship Review Without Notification Permissibility" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case169:Engineer_B_Peer_Review_Knowledge_Requirement_Purpose-Limited_Interpretation ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case169:Engineer_A_Original_Design_Completion_and_Payment_State,
case169:Engineer_B_Review_Conducted_With_Engineer_As_Knowledge ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case169:Engineer_B_Peer_Review_Knowledge_Requirement_Purpose-Limited_Interpretation ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A alleged Engineer B obtained employment by a questionable method of criticizing Engineer A without his knowledge; however, Engineer A had been fully paid and the project completed seven years prior, with ownership having since changed." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case169:Terminated-Connection_Peer_Review_Permissibility_Invoked_by_Engineer_B_Review_of_Engineer_A_Work ;
proeth:discoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T22:19:17.209429+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T22:19:17.209429+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer B" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Post-Completion Terminated-Relationship Review Without Incumbent Notification Permissibility Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer B was not ethically required to notify Engineer A before commencing the post-occupancy inspection, because Engineer A's contractual relationship with the project had been fully completed and terminated through full payment years prior to the review; the NSPE III.8.a notification requirement does not apply to engineers whose connection with the work has been terminated." ;
proeth:sourcetext "The project was completed and occupied four years later, and Engineer A was fully paid for his services." ;
proeth:temporalscope "At the time Engineer B commenced the post-occupancy inspection" ;
proeth:textreferences "Approximately seven years after the original occupancy, ownership of the facility changed.",
"Engineer A requested the registration board to find Engineer B guilty of 'misconduct' in that Engineer B had obtained employment by a questionable method of criticizing Engineer A without his knowledge",
"The project was completed and occupied four years later, and Engineer A was fully paid for his services." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 169 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T22:36:17.042544"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 169 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
169
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T22:19:17.209429+00:00
First case
169
Generated
2026-03-01T22:19:17.209429+00:00
Attributed to
Case 169 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T22:36:17.042544
Generated by
ProEthica Case 169 Extraction