Engineer B Available Evidence Consultation Satisfied Joint Wiring Inspection
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#Engineer_B_Available_Evidence_Consultation_Satisfied_Joint_Wiring_Inspection
Properties
Instance of
AvailableEvidenceConsultationBeforeAdverseTechnicalOpinion
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#AvailableEvidenceConsultationBeforeAdverseTechnicalOpinion
Case context
Engineer B participated in a joint inspection of the wiring with Engineer A and the city wiring inspector before issuing findings; the joint inspection found no wiring defects, and Engineer B's subsequent adverse findings on heating equipment were based on further study after the joint inspection.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.87
Importance
medium
Obligated party
Engineer B
Obligation statement
Engineer B was obligated to consult all available evidence — including participating in the joint wiring inspection with Engineer A and the city wiring inspector — before forming adverse technical opinions about the facility's systems.
Temporal scope
Before issuing adverse findings on the facility's engineering systems
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Joint Wiring Inspection Revealing No Defects
derivedFromPrinciple
Available Evidence Consultation Satisfied By Joint Wiring Inspection
Source Evidence
Source text
At the owner's request, a joint inspection of the wiring was made by the two engineers and the city wiring inspector.
Text references
At the owner's request, a joint inspection of the wiring was made by the two engineers and the city wiring inspector.
Engineer B thereafter conducted a further study and filed a report with the owner.
The inspection did not reveal any defects in the wiring.
The owner advised Engineer B of his complaint concerning the plumbing and heating systems.
TTL
@prefix case169: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case169:Engineer_B_Available_Evidence_Consultation_Satisfied_Joint_Wiring_Inspection a proeth:AvailableEvidenceConsultationBeforeAdverseTechnicalOpinion,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Available Evidence Consultation Satisfied Joint Wiring Inspection" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case169:Joint_Wiring_Inspection_Revealing_No_Defects ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer B participated in a joint inspection of the wiring with Engineer A and the city wiring inspector before issuing findings; the joint inspection found no wiring defects, and Engineer B's subsequent adverse findings on heating equipment were based on further study after the joint inspection." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.87" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case169:Available_Evidence_Consultation_Satisfied_By_Joint_Wiring_Inspection ;
proeth:discoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T22:19:17.209429+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T22:19:17.209429+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer B" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Available Evidence Consultation Before Adverse Technical Opinion" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer B was obligated to consult all available evidence — including participating in the joint wiring inspection with Engineer A and the city wiring inspector — before forming adverse technical opinions about the facility's systems." ;
proeth:sourcetext "At the owner's request, a joint inspection of the wiring was made by the two engineers and the city wiring inspector." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Before issuing adverse findings on the facility's engineering systems" ;
proeth:textreferences "At the owner's request, a joint inspection of the wiring was made by the two engineers and the city wiring inspector.",
"Engineer B thereafter conducted a further study and filed a report with the owner.",
"The inspection did not reveal any defects in the wiring.",
"The owner advised Engineer B of his complaint concerning the plumbing and heating systems." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 169 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T22:36:17.043254"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 169 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
169
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T22:19:17.209429+00:00
First case
169
Generated
2026-03-01T22:19:17.209429+00:00
Attributed to
Case 169 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T22:36:17.043254
Generated by
ProEthica Case 169 Extraction