Engineer B Joint Wiring Inspection Participation Adverse Opinion Grounding
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#Engineer_B_Joint_Wiring_Inspection_Participation_Adverse_Opinion_Grounding
Properties
Instance of
JointInspectionParticipationAdverseOpinionEpistemicGroundingObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#JointInspectionParticipationAdverseOpinionEpistemicGroundingObligation
Case context
Engineer B was retained by the new owner to inspect the facility; a joint wiring inspection was conducted with Engineer A and the city wiring inspector at the owner's request before Engineer B issued findings on the wiring.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.85
Importance
medium
Obligated party
Engineer B
Obligation statement
Engineer B was obligated to participate in available joint inspection opportunities with Engineer A and the city wiring inspector before issuing adverse findings, ensuring that adverse opinions were grounded in shared evidentiary review.
Temporal scope
Before issuing adverse technical findings on the wiring systems
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Joint Wiring Inspection Revealing No Defects
derivedFromPrinciple
Available Evidence Consultation Satisfied By Joint Wiring Inspection
Source Evidence
Source text
At the owner's request, a joint inspection of the wiring was made by the two engineers and the city wiring inspector.
Text references
At the owner's request, a joint inspection of the wiring was made by the two engineers and the city wiring inspector.
The inspection did not reveal any defects in the wiring.
TTL
@prefix case169: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case169:Engineer_B_Joint_Wiring_Inspection_Participation_Adverse_Opinion_Grounding a proeth:JointInspectionParticipationAdverseOpinionEpistemicGroundingObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Joint Wiring Inspection Participation Adverse Opinion Grounding" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case169:Joint_Wiring_Inspection_Revealing_No_Defects ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer B was retained by the new owner to inspect the facility; a joint wiring inspection was conducted with Engineer A and the city wiring inspector at the owner's request before Engineer B issued findings on the wiring." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.85" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case169:Available_Evidence_Consultation_Satisfied_By_Joint_Wiring_Inspection ;
proeth:discoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T22:19:17.209429+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T22:19:17.209429+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer B" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Joint Inspection Participation Adverse Opinion Epistemic Grounding Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer B was obligated to participate in available joint inspection opportunities with Engineer A and the city wiring inspector before issuing adverse findings, ensuring that adverse opinions were grounded in shared evidentiary review." ;
proeth:sourcetext "At the owner's request, a joint inspection of the wiring was made by the two engineers and the city wiring inspector." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Before issuing adverse technical findings on the wiring systems" ;
proeth:textreferences "At the owner's request, a joint inspection of the wiring was made by the two engineers and the city wiring inspector.",
"The inspection did not reveal any defects in the wiring." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 169 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T22:36:17.042054"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 169 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
169
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T22:19:17.209429+00:00
First case
169
Generated
2026-03-01T22:19:17.209429+00:00
Attributed to
Case 169 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T22:36:17.042054
Generated by
ProEthica Case 169 Extraction