Engineer B Post-Occupancy Inspection Honest Adverse Finding Non-Suppression
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#Engineer_B_Post-Occupancy_Inspection_Honest_Adverse_Finding_Non-Suppression
Properties
Instance of
Post-OccupancyInspectionHonestAdverseFindingNon-SuppressionObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Post-OccupancyInspectionHonestAdverseFindingNon-SuppressionObligation
Case context
Engineer B's post-occupancy inspection found no problem with the plumbing design but identified inadequacies in the heating equipment originally specified by Engineer A; Engineer A alleged the report was not objective and did not include all pertinent information.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.91
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer B (Post-Occupancy Facility Inspection Engineer)
Obligation statement
Engineer B was obligated to report all material findings honestly and completely to the new facility owner — including findings that identified inadequacies in Engineer A's original heating equipment specifications — without suppressing adverse conclusions out of collegial deference to Engineer A.
Temporal scope
At the time of preparing and submitting the post-occupancy inspection report
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Engineer B Employment Acquisition Through Predecess or Design Criticism, Engineer B Report Alleging Design Inadequacies in Heating Equipment Sizing
derivedFromPrinciple
Honest Disagreement Permissibility Applied to Engineer B Findings
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer B's report demonstrated objectivity by finding no problem with the plumbing design while identifying inadequacies in the heating equipment
Text references
Engineer B's report demonstrated objectivity by finding no problem with the plumbing design while identifying inadequacies in the heating equipment
The fact that Engineer B concluded that some changes were needed in the equipment originally specified cannot alone constitute the kind of actions barred by 12
TTL
@prefix case169: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/169#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case169:Engineer_B_Post-Occupancy_Inspection_Honest_Adverse_Finding_Non-Suppression a proeth:Post-OccupancyInspectionHonestAdverseFindingNon-SuppressionObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Post-Occupancy Inspection Honest Adverse Finding Non-Suppression" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case169:Engineer_B_Adverse_Technical_Finding_Malicious_Intent_Non-Satisfaction_Non-Violation ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case169:Engineer_B_Employment_Acquisition_Through_Predecessor_Design_Criticism,
case169:Engineer_B_Report_Alleging_Design_Inadequacies_in_Heating_Equipment_Sizing ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case169:Engineer_B_Adverse_Technical_Finding_Malicious_Intent_Non-Satisfaction_Non-Violation ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer B's post-occupancy inspection found no problem with the plumbing design but identified inadequacies in the heating equipment originally specified by Engineer A; Engineer A alleged the report was not objective and did not include all pertinent information." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case169:Honest_Disagreement_Permissibility_Applied_to_Engineer_B_Findings ;
proeth:discoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T22:26:07.553169+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "169" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T22:26:07.553169+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer B (Post-Occupancy Facility Inspection Engineer)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Post-Occupancy Inspection Honest Adverse Finding Non-Suppression Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer B was obligated to report all material findings honestly and completely to the new facility owner — including findings that identified inadequacies in Engineer A's original heating equipment specifications — without suppressing adverse conclusions out of collegial deference to Engineer A." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer B's report demonstrated objectivity by finding no problem with the plumbing design while identifying inadequacies in the heating equipment" ;
proeth:temporalscope "At the time of preparing and submitting the post-occupancy inspection report" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer B's report demonstrated objectivity by finding no problem with the plumbing design while identifying inadequacies in the heating equipment",
"The fact that Engineer B concluded that some changes were needed in the equipment originally specified cannot alone constitute the kind of actions barred by 12" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 169 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T22:36:17.050135"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 169 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
169
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T22:26:07.553169+00:00
First case
169
Generated
2026-03-01T22:26:07.553169+00:00
Attributed to
Case 169 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T22:36:17.050135
Generated by
ProEthica Case 169 Extraction