Engineer A Construction Phase Safety Recommendation Abandoning Engineer

@prefix case89: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/89#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case89:Engineer_A_Construction_Phase_Safety_Recommendation_Abandoning_Engineer a proeth:ConstructionPhaseSafetyRecommendationAbandoningEngineer, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Construction Phase Safety Recommendation Abandoning Engineer" ; proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple case89:Engineer_Pressure_Resistance_Invoked_Against_Client_Cost-Based_Override_of_Safety_Judgment, case89:Engineer_Pressure_Resistance_Invoked_Against_Engineer_A_Yielding_to_Client_Cost_Objection, case89:Ethics_Code_as_Higher_Standard_Than_Legal_Minimum_Invoked_for_NSPE_vs_State_Board_Distinction, case89:Faithful_Agent_Notification_Obligation_Invoked_for_Project_Success_Risk_Communication, case89:Faithful_Agent_Obligation_Within_Ethical_Limits_Invoked_to_Define_Boundary_of_Engineer_As_Client_Loyalty, case89:Going-Along_Prohibition_Invoked_Against_Engineer_A_After_Client_Cost_Refusal, case89:Going-Along_Prohibition_Invoked_Against_Engineer_A_Post-Client-Refusal, case89:Insistence_on_Client_Remedial_Action_Invoked_for_On-Site_Representative_Requirement, case89:Passive_Acquiescence_After_Safety_Notification_Invoked_Against_Engineer_A, case89:Professional_Judgment_Abandonment_Under_Cost_Pressure_Invoked_Against_Engineer_A, case89:Project_Withdrawal_as_Ethical_Recourse_Invoked_as_Engineer_As_Required_Response, case89:Project_Withdrawal_as_Ethical_Recourse_Invoked_for_Engineer_A_Dangerous_Project, case89:Public_Welfare_Paramount_Invoked_Against_Engineer_A_Cost-Capitulation, case89:Public_Welfare_Paramount_Invoked_Against_Engineer_A_Proceeding_After_Safety_Recommendation_Refused ; proeth-core:hasObligation case89:Active_Insistence_Non-Substitution_by_Silent_Notification_Engineer_A_Safety_Staffing, case89:Client_Safety_Violation_Insistence_or_Withdrawal_Engineer_A_Construction_Phase_Representative, case89:Cost-Pressure_Safety_Recommendation_Abandonment_Prohibition_Engineer_A_On-Site_Representative, case89:Engineer_A_Client_Override_Written_Documentation_Obligation, case89:Engineer_A_Client_Safety_Violation_Insistence_or_Withdrawal_Obligation, case89:Engineer_A_Construction_Phase_Safety_Staffing_Insistence_or_Withdrawal, case89:Engineer_A_Cost-Pressure_Safety_Recommendation_Abandonment_Violation, case89:Engineer_A_Going-Along_Prohibition_Violation_After_Client_Cost_Refusal, case89:Engineer_A_Graduated_Escalation_Before_Project_Withdrawal, case89:Engineer_A_Passive_Acquiescence_Independent_Ethical_Failure, case89:Engineer_A_Persistent_Client_Safety_Persuasion_Before_Withdrawal, case89:Ethics_Code_Higher_Standard_Than_State_Board_Rules_Engineer_A_Construction_Project, case89:Going-Along_Prohibition_Engineer_A_Post-Client-Cost-Refusal_Construction_Phase, case89:Passive_Acquiescence_Independent_Ethical_Failure_Engineer_A_On-Site_Representative_Refusal, case89:Project_Success_Safety-Inclusive_Notification_Engineer_A_Client_Refusal, case89:Public_Welfare_Paramount_Obligation_Engineer_A_Cost-Capitulation_Violation, case89:Voluntary_Ethics_Code_Higher_Standard_Commitment_Engineer_A_NSPE_Member ; proeth:attributes "{'license': 'Professional Engineer', 'specialty': 'Complete engineering services', 'safety_recommendation_made': True, 'recommendation_abandoned': True}" ; proeth:caseinvolvement "Engineer A is retained to provide complete engineering services, identifies the dangerous nature of the construction phase and recommends a full-time on-site project representative, but proceeds with the project after the client refuses on cost grounds — abandoning the safety recommendation in subordination to the client's economic concerns." ; proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ; proeth:confidence "0.97" ; proeth:discoveredincase "89" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T18:06:57.656355+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "89" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T18:06:57.656355+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:relationships "{'type': 'public_responsibility', 'target': 'General Public / Construction Workers'}", "{'type': 'serves_client', 'target': 'Project Client Cost-Objecting Safety Staffing Refusing Client'}" ; proeth:rolecategory "public_responsibility" ; proeth:roleclass "Construction Phase Safety Recommendation Abandoning Engineer" ; proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A recommends to the client that a full-time, on-site project representative be hired for the project" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer A proceeds with his work on the project", "Engineer A recommends to the client that a full-time, on-site project representative be hired for the project" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 89 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T18:38:27.064811"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 89 Extraction" .