Engineer A Client Override Written Documentation Obligation
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/89#Engineer_A_Client_Override_Written_Documentation_Obligation
Properties
Instance of
ClientOverrideofSafetyAnalysisWrittenDocumentationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientOverrideofSafetyAnalysisWrittenDocumentationObligation
Case context
The client overrode Engineer A's safety staffing recommendation on cost grounds; Engineer A had a duty to document this override and the professional objection before proceeding.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.82
Importance
medium
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to document in writing the client's cost-driven refusal to hire the full-time on-site representative and Engineer A's professional objection to proceeding without that safety measure, so that the record preserved evidence of Engineer A's professional judgment and the client's assumption of responsibility for the decision.
Temporal scope
Upon the client's refusal and before proceeding with the project
Relationships
competesWith
Client Safety Violation Insistence or Withdrawal Engineer A Construction Phase Representative
defeasibleUnder
Confirmed Construction Risk Without Adequate Safeguards
Source Evidence
Source text
After reviewing the completed project plans and costs, the client indicates to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired.
Text references
After reviewing the completed project plans and costs, the client indicates to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired.
Engineer A proceeds with his work on the project.
TTL
@prefix case89: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/89#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case89:Engineer_A_Client_Override_Written_Documentation_Obligation a proeth:ClientOverrideofSafetyAnalysisWrittenDocumentationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Client Override Written Documentation Obligation" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case89:Client_Safety_Violation_Insistence_or_Withdrawal_Engineer_A_Construction_Phase_Representative ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case89:Confirmed_Construction_Risk_Without_Adequate_Safeguards ;
proeth:casecontext "The client overrode Engineer A's safety staffing recommendation on cost grounds; Engineer A had a duty to document this override and the professional objection before proceeding." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.82" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "89" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T18:10:57.098840+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "89" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T18:10:57.098840+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Client Override of Safety Analysis Written Documentation Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to document in writing the client's cost-driven refusal to hire the full-time on-site representative and Engineer A's professional objection to proceeding without that safety measure, so that the record preserved evidence of Engineer A's professional judgment and the client's assumption of responsibility for the decision." ;
proeth:sourcetext "After reviewing the completed project plans and costs, the client indicates to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Upon the client's refusal and before proceeding with the project" ;
proeth:textreferences "After reviewing the completed project plans and costs, the client indicates to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired.",
"Engineer A proceeds with his work on the project." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 89 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T18:38:27.068475"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 89 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
89
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T18:10:57.098840+00:00
First case
89
Generated
2026-03-01T18:10:57.098840+00:00
Attributed to
Case 89 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T18:38:27.068475
Generated by
ProEthica Case 89 Extraction