Project Success Safety-Inclusive Notification Engineer A Client Refusal
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/89#Project_Success_Safety-Inclusive_Notification_Engineer_A_Client_Refusal
Properties
Instance of
ProjectSuccessNotificationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ProjectSuccessNotificationObligation
Case context
Engineer A notified the client of the need for a full-time on-site project representative for the dangerous construction phase; this notification satisfied Section III.1.b's requirement to advise the client when the project will not be successful.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated under NSPE Code Section III.1.b to inform the client that the project would not be 'successful' — in the safety sense — if a full-time on-site project representative was not hired, recognizing that success encompasses safety outcomes, not merely structural and economic completion.
Temporal scope
When Engineer A determined that the construction phase was dangerous and required a full-time on-site representative
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Client Cost-Based Rejection of On-Site Safety Representative
Source Evidence
Source text
Section III.1.b. clearly requires the engineer to inform a client when the engineer believes that a project will not be successful.
Text references
It is clear from the facts that Engineer A did notify the client of the need to hire a full-time, on-site project representative for the construction phase of the project.
Section III.1.b. clearly requires the engineer to inform a client when the engineer believes that a project will not be successful.
The term 'successful' includes not merely the structural and economic success of a project but also the success of the project from a safety standpoint.
Therefore, Engineer A did act in accordance with Section III.1.b.
TTL
@prefix case89: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/89#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case89:Project_Success_Safety-Inclusive_Notification_Engineer_A_Client_Refusal a proeth:ProjectSuccessNotificationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Project Success Safety-Inclusive Notification Engineer A Client Refusal" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case89:Public_Welfare_Paramount_Obligation_Engineer_A_Cost-Capitulation_Violation ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case89:Client_Cost-Based_Rejection_of_On-Site_Safety_Representative ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A notified the client of the need for a full-time on-site project representative for the dangerous construction phase; this notification satisfied Section III.1.b's requirement to advise the client when the project will not be successful." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case89:Faithful_Agent_Notification_Obligation_Invoked_for_Project_Success_Risk_Communication ;
proeth:discoveredincase "89" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T18:16:06.891922+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "89" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T18:16:06.891922+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Project Success Notification Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated under NSPE Code Section III.1.b to inform the client that the project would not be 'successful' — in the safety sense — if a full-time on-site project representative was not hired, recognizing that success encompasses safety outcomes, not merely structural and economic completion." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Section III.1.b. clearly requires the engineer to inform a client when the engineer believes that a project will not be successful." ;
proeth:temporalscope "When Engineer A determined that the construction phase was dangerous and required a full-time on-site representative" ;
proeth:textreferences "It is clear from the facts that Engineer A did notify the client of the need to hire a full-time, on-site project representative for the construction phase of the project.",
"Section III.1.b. clearly requires the engineer to inform a client when the engineer believes that a project will not be successful.",
"The term 'successful' includes not merely the structural and economic success of a project but also the success of the project from a safety standpoint.",
"Therefore, Engineer A did act in accordance with Section III.1.b." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 89 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T18:38:27.072367"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 89 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
89
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T18:16:06.891922+00:00
First case
89
Generated
2026-03-01T18:16:06.891922+00:00
Attributed to
Case 89 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T18:38:27.072367
Generated by
ProEthica Case 89 Extraction