Engineer A Going-Along Prohibition Violation After Client Cost Refusal
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/89#Engineer_A_Going-Along_Prohibition_Violation_After_Client_Cost_Refusal
Properties
Instance of
Going-AlongProhibitionAfterClientSafetyRefusalObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Going-AlongProhibitionAfterClientSafetyRefusalObligation
Case context
After the client refused the safety staffing recommendation on cost grounds, Engineer A proceeded with the project without further insistence, escalation, or withdrawal, constituting passive acquiescence to a known safety risk.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to refrain from going along — silently proceeding with the project without dissent, escalation, or withdrawal — after the client refused to hire the full-time on-site representative that Engineer A had identified as necessary for the dangerous construction phase.
Temporal scope
Immediately upon the client's refusal and throughout the continuation of the project
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Going-Along Prohibition Invoked Against Engineer A Post-Client-Refusal
Source Evidence
Source text
After reviewing the completed project plans and costs, the client indicates to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired.
Text references
After reviewing the completed project plans and costs, the client indicates to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired.
Engineer A proceeds with his work on the project.
TTL
@prefix case89: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/89#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case89:Engineer_A_Going-Along_Prohibition_Violation_After_Client_Cost_Refusal a proeth:Going-AlongProhibitionAfterClientSafetyRefusalObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Going-Along Prohibition Violation After Client Cost Refusal" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case89:Active_Insistence_Non-Substitution_by_Silent_Notification_Engineer_A_Safety_Staffing ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case89:Client_Economic_Interest_Displacing_Engineer_Primary_Safety_Obligation ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case89:Active_Insistence_Non-Substitution_by_Silent_Notification_Engineer_A_Safety_Staffing ;
proeth:casecontext "After the client refused the safety staffing recommendation on cost grounds, Engineer A proceeded with the project without further insistence, escalation, or withdrawal, constituting passive acquiescence to a known safety risk." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case89:Going-Along_Prohibition_Invoked_Against_Engineer_A_Post-Client-Refusal ;
proeth:discoveredincase "89" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T18:10:57.098840+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "89" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T18:10:57.098840+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Going-Along Prohibition After Client Safety Refusal Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to refrain from going along — silently proceeding with the project without dissent, escalation, or withdrawal — after the client refused to hire the full-time on-site representative that Engineer A had identified as necessary for the dangerous construction phase." ;
proeth:sourcetext "After reviewing the completed project plans and costs, the client indicates to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Immediately upon the client's refusal and throughout the continuation of the project" ;
proeth:textreferences "After reviewing the completed project plans and costs, the client indicates to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired.",
"Engineer A proceeds with his work on the project." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 89 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T18:38:27.067768"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 89 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
89
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T18:10:57.098840+00:00
First case
89
Generated
2026-03-01T18:10:57.098840+00:00
Attributed to
Case 89 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T18:38:27.067768
Generated by
ProEthica Case 89 Extraction