Engineer F Contractor License Revocation Omitting Engineer

@prefix case148: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case148:Engineer_F_Contractor_License_Revocation_Omitting_Engineer a proeth:ContractorLicenseRevocationOmittingEngineer, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer F Contractor License Revocation Omitting Engineer" ; proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple case148:Allegation-Adjudication_Distinction_Invoked_in_Engineer_F_vs_Engineer_A_Comparison, case148:Contractor_License_Number_Lending_by_Engineer_F, case148:Cross-License_Disciplinary_Disclosure_Scope_Invoked_by_Engineer_F_Application, case148:Domain-Relevance_Amplification_Applied_to_Engineer_F_Fire_Protection_Contractor_Revocation, case148:Ethics_Code_Higher_Standard_Than_Legal_Minimum_Applied_to_Engineer_F_Employment_Disclosure, case148:Honesty_in_Professional_Representations_Invoked_by_Engineer_F_Employment_Application, case148:Licensure_Integrity_Implicated_by_Engineer_F_License_Lending, case148:Omission_Materiality_of_Contractor_License_Revocation_by_Engineer_F, case148:Personal_Misconduct_Ethics_Code_Jurisdiction_Applied_to_Engineer_F_Contractor_Revocation, case148:Prudential_Disclosure_Relational_Self-Protection_Applied_to_Engineer_F_Employer_Relationship, case148:Public_Welfare_Paramount_Invoked_as_Cross-Domain_Character_Standard_for_Engineer_F, case148:Technically_True_But_Misleading_Answer_by_Engineer_F, case148:Technically_True_But_Misleading_Statement_Prohibition_Applied_to_Engineer_F_Employment_Application, case148:Whole-Person_Character_Integrity_Standard_Applied_to_Engineer_F_Employment_Application ; proeth-core:hasObligation case148:Engineer_F_Adjudicated_Misconduct_Employment_Application_Disclosure, case148:Engineer_F_Adjudicated_Misconduct_Employment_Application_Disclosure_Failure, case148:Engineer_F_Artfully_Misleading_Employment_Application_Answer, case148:Engineer_F_Contractor_License_Number_Lending_Prohibition_Violation, case148:Engineer_F_Contractor_License_Revocation_Non-Disclosure_Employment_Application, case148:Engineer_F_Domain-Relevance_Amplified_Fire_Protection_Disclosure_Failure, case148:Engineer_F_Employer-Employee_Trust_Foundation_Proactive_Disclosure_Failure, case148:Engineer_F_Employer_Question_Intent_Broad_Interpretation_Failure, case148:Engineer_F_Employment_Application_Contractor_License_Revocation_Proactive_Disclosure, case148:Engineer_F_Ethics_Beyond_Minimum_Employment_Disclosure_Failure, case148:Engineer_F_Ethics_Code_Supersession_of_Legalistic_Minimum_Employment_Disclosure, case148:Engineer_F_Non-Engineering_License_Disciplinary_History_Employment_Disclosure_Failure, case148:Engineer_F_Non-Engineering_Professional_License_Revocation_Character_Disclosure, case148:Engineer_F_Personal_Misconduct_Ethics_Code_Jurisdiction_Recognition_Failure, case148:Engineer_F_Qualifications_Non-Misrepresentation_Employment_Application, case148:Engineer_F_Technically_True_Misleading_Answer_Employment_Application ; proeth:attributes "{'license': 'Professional Engineer', 'prior_role': 'Fire sprinkler contracting firm owner', 'contractor_license_status': 'Revoked', 'PE_license_status': 'Active (never suspended or revoked)'}" ; proeth:caseinvolvement "Engineer F, a licensed PE and former fire sprinkler contracting firm owner, applied for an engineering position and answered 'no' to the application question about disciplinary action or license suspension/revocation. His PE license was never revoked, but his contractor's license was revoked for allowing an unlicensed individual unrelated to his firm to use his contractor license number on another project. The omission of this material fact on the employment application raises obligations of truthfulness and disclosure." ; proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ; proeth:confidence "0.97" ; proeth:discoveredincase "148" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T22:49:35.319408+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "148" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T22:49:35.319408+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:relationships "{'type': 'applicant_to', 'target': 'Engineering Firm Hiring Authority'}", "{'type': 'former_owner_of', 'target': 'Fire Sprinkler Contracting Firm'}" ; proeth:rolecategory "employer_relationship" ; proeth:roleclass "Contractor License Revocation Omitting Engineer" ; proeth:sourcetext "Engineer F is a professional engineer and applies for a professional engineering position with an engineering firm" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer F is a professional engineer and applies for a professional engineering position with an engineering firm", "Engineer F responds in the negative on the employment application", "Engineer F's contractor's license was revoked because he allowed an unlicensed individual who was unrelated to his contracting firm to use the contractor license number on another project" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 148 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T23:11:08.561135"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 148 Extraction" .