Domain-Relevance Amplification Applied to Engineer F Fire Protection Contractor Revocation
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#Domain-Relevance_Amplification_Applied_to_Engineer_F_Fire_Protection_Contractor_Revocation
Properties
Instance of
Domain-RelevanceAmplificationofDisclosureObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Domain-RelevanceAmplificationofDisclosureObligation
Applied to
Engineer F's contractor license revocation for fire protection work, in context of engineering employment application
Balancing with
Cross-License Disciplinary History Disclosure Scope Principle
Concrete expression
The Board specifically noted that Engineer F's contractor license revocation arose from fire protection services — directly relevant to engineering work — which heightened the employer's interest in knowing about the revocation beyond what would apply to a revocation in an unrelated domain
Confidence
0.85
Importance
high
Interpretation
The domain overlap between the prior misconduct (fire protection contracting) and the prospective engineering duties amplified the disclosure obligation beyond the baseline, because the employer's legitimate interest in assessing fitness was directly implicated
Invoked by
Engineer F Contractor License Revocation Omitting Engineer
Tension resolution
Domain relevance resolved in favor of heightened disclosure obligation; the fire protection subject matter made the revocation particularly material to the employer
Source Evidence
Source text
the fact that Engineer F's services related to fire protection of a facility would seem to be of particular interest to the employer.
Text references
Holding paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public is the first Fundamental Canon of the NSPE Code of Ethics that all Engineers should practice at all times, whether in the practice of engineering or whatever practice they perform
the fact that Engineer F's services related to fire protection of a facility would seem to be of particular interest to the employer
TTL
@prefix case148: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case148:Domain-Relevance_Amplification_Applied_to_Engineer_F_Fire_Protection_Contractor_Revocation a proeth:Domain-RelevanceAmplificationofDisclosureObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Domain-Relevance Amplification Applied to Engineer F Fire Protection Contractor Revocation" ;
proeth:appliedto "Engineer F's contractor license revocation for fire protection work, in context of engineering employment application" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Cross-License Disciplinary History Disclosure Scope Principle" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "The Board specifically noted that Engineer F's contractor license revocation arose from fire protection services — directly relevant to engineering work — which heightened the employer's interest in knowing about the revocation beyond what would apply to a revocation in an unrelated domain" ;
proeth:confidence "0.85" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "148" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T22:59:35.259666+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "148" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T22:59:35.259666+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "The domain overlap between the prior misconduct (fire protection contracting) and the prospective engineering duties amplified the disclosure obligation beyond the baseline, because the employer's legitimate interest in assessing fitness was directly implicated" ;
proeth:invokedby "Engineer F Contractor License Revocation Omitting Engineer" ;
proeth:principleclass "Domain-Relevance Amplification of Disclosure Obligation" ;
proeth:sourcetext "the fact that Engineer F's services related to fire protection of a facility would seem to be of particular interest to the employer." ;
proeth:tensionresolution "Domain relevance resolved in favor of heightened disclosure obligation; the fire protection subject matter made the revocation particularly material to the employer" ;
proeth:textreferences "Holding paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public is the first Fundamental Canon of the NSPE Code of Ethics that all Engineers should practice at all times, whether in the practice of engineering or whatever practice they perform",
"the fact that Engineer F's services related to fire protection of a facility would seem to be of particular interest to the employer" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 148 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T23:11:08.577753"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 148 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
148
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T22:59:35.259666+00:00
First case
148
Generated
2026-02-28T22:59:35.259666+00:00
Attributed to
Case 148 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T23:11:08.577753
Generated by
ProEthica Case 148 Extraction