Engineer F Adjudicated Misconduct Employment Application Disclosure
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#Engineer_F_Adjudicated_Misconduct_Employment_Application_Disclosure
Properties
Instance of
AdjudicatedProfessionalMisconductEmploymentApplicationDisclosureObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#AdjudicatedProfessionalMisconductEmploymentApplicationDisclosureObligation
Case context
The contractor's license revocation was an adjudicated outcome, not a pending allegation. Engineer F's negative answer effectively concealed this adjudicated finding from the prospective employer.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer F
Obligation statement
Engineer F was obligated to disclose the adjudicated revocation of his contractor's license on the employment application, because an adjudicated finding of wrongdoing — as distinct from a mere allegation — cannot be withheld on the grounds that the application question did not explicitly name contractor licenses.
Temporal scope
At the time of completing the employment application
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer F responds in the negative on the employment application.
Text references
Engineer F responds in the negative on the employment application.
Engineer F's contractor's license was revoked because he allowed an unlicensed individual who was unrelated to his contracting firm to use the contractor license number on another project.
TTL
@prefix case148: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case148:Engineer_F_Adjudicated_Misconduct_Employment_Application_Disclosure a proeth:AdjudicatedProfessionalMisconductEmploymentApplicationDisclosureObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer F Adjudicated Misconduct Employment Application Disclosure" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case148:Engineer_A_Pending_Complaint_Limited_Background_Information_Prudential_Weighing_BER_97-11,
case148:Engineer_F_Employer_Question_Intent_Broad_Interpretation_Failure ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case148:Engineer_F_Employer_Question_Intent_Broad_Interpretation_Failure ;
proeth:casecontext "The contractor's license revocation was an adjudicated outcome, not a pending allegation. Engineer F's negative answer effectively concealed this adjudicated finding from the prospective employer." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case148:Allegation-Adjudication_Distinction_Invoked_in_Engineer_F_vs_Engineer_A_Comparison ;
proeth:discoveredincase "148" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T22:55:36.193353+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "148" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T22:55:36.193353+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer F" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Adjudicated Professional Misconduct Employment Application Disclosure Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer F was obligated to disclose the adjudicated revocation of his contractor's license on the employment application, because an adjudicated finding of wrongdoing — as distinct from a mere allegation — cannot be withheld on the grounds that the application question did not explicitly name contractor licenses." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer F responds in the negative on the employment application." ;
proeth:temporalscope "At the time of completing the employment application" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer F responds in the negative on the employment application.",
"Engineer F's contractor's license was revoked because he allowed an unlicensed individual who was unrelated to his contracting firm to use the contractor license number on another project." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 148 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T23:11:08.573628"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 148 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
148
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-28T22:55:36.193353+00:00
First case
148
Generated
2026-02-28T22:55:36.193353+00:00
Attributed to
Case 148 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T23:11:08.573628
Generated by
ProEthica Case 148 Extraction