Cross-License Disciplinary Disclosure Scope Invoked by Engineer F Application

@prefix case148: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case148:Cross-License_Disciplinary_Disclosure_Scope_Invoked_by_Engineer_F_Application a proeth:Cross-LicenseDisciplinaryHistoryDisclosureScopePrinciple, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Cross-License Disciplinary Disclosure Scope Invoked by Engineer F Application" ; proeth:appliedto "Contractor license revocation for license lending", "Engineering firm employment application disciplinary history question" ; proeth:balancingwith "Omission Materiality Threshold in Professional Disclosure", "Personal Privacy Right in Professional Self-Disclosure", "Technically True But Misleading Statement Prohibition" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ; proeth:concreteexpression "The employment application question was limited to discipline 'in the practice of professional engineering' and PE license revocation/suspension; Engineer F's contractor license revocation was technically outside this literal scope, raising the question of whether Engineer F had a disclosure obligation beyond the literal question" ; proeth:confidence "0.87" ; proeth:discoveredincase "148" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T22:54:16.754277+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "148" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T22:54:16.754277+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:interpretation "The scope of the question as written ('professional engineering' discipline, PE license) determines the literal disclosure obligation; the contractor license revocation falls outside this scope, but the underlying conduct — enabling unlicensed practice — may be sufficiently connected to professional character to trigger a broader honesty obligation" ; proeth:invokedby "Engineer F Contractor License Revocation Omitting Engineer" ; proeth:principleclass "Cross-License Disciplinary History Disclosure Scope Principle" ; proeth:sourcetext "Engineer F's engineering license was never revoked or suspended, Engineer F's contractor's license was revoked because he allowed an unlicensed individual who was unrelated to his contracting firm to use the contractor license number on another project." ; proeth:tensionresolution "The question's explicit limitation to PE practice and PE license actions means Engineer F's negative answer was literally within scope; however, the ethical analysis must also assess whether the overall impression was materially misleading given that the contractor license revocation arose from conduct (enabling unlicensed practice) directly relevant to professional integrity" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer F's engineering license was never revoked or suspended, Engineer F's contractor's license was revoked because he allowed an unlicensed individual who was unrelated to his contracting firm to use the contractor license number on another project.", "On the engineering firm employment application, there is a question asking whether the engineer 'has ever been disciplined in the practice of professional engineering or had his license suspended or revoked?'" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 148 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T23:11:08.570938"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 148 Extraction" .