Engineer F Non-Engineering License Disciplinary History Employment Disclosure Failure
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#Engineer_F_Non-Engineering_License_Disciplinary_History_Employment_Disclosure_Failure
Properties
Instance of
Non-EngineeringLicenseDisciplinaryHistoryEmploymentDisclosureObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Non-EngineeringLicenseDisciplinaryHistoryEmploymentDisclosureObligation
Case context
Engineer F held a contractor's license in addition to his PE license. The contractor license was revoked for license-number lending. The employment application question was limited to PE license discipline, but the Board found Engineer F had an ethical obligation to disclose the contractor license revocation as well.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.93
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer F
Obligation statement
Engineer F was obligated to disclose the revocation of his contractor's license — a non-engineering professional license — on the employment application, because the revocation resulted from an adjudicated finding of wrongdoing and reflected on his professional character and fitness for engineering practice.
Temporal scope
At the time of completing the employment application
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Omission Materiality of Contract or License Revocation by Engineer F
Source Evidence
Source text
The fact that the request by the employer related solely to having a license suspended or being disciplined in connection with the practice of professional engineering should have been of no consequence to Engineer F.
Text references
BER Case 75-5 clearly indicates that the BER must look beyond just the specific practice of engineering to the whole person when addressing ethical issues relating to professional engineers.
The fact that the request by the employer related solely to having a license suspended or being disciplined in connection with the practice of professional engineering should have been of no consequence to Engineer F.
TTL
@prefix case148: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/148#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case148:Engineer_F_Non-Engineering_License_Disciplinary_History_Employment_Disclosure_Failure a proeth:Non-EngineeringLicenseDisciplinaryHistoryEmploymentDisclosureObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer F Non-Engineering License Disciplinary History Employment Disclosure Failure" ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case148:Engineer_F_Adjudicated_Misconduct_Employment_Application_Disclosure_Failure ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer F held a contractor's license in addition to his PE license. The contractor license was revoked for license-number lending. The employment application question was limited to PE license discipline, but the Board found Engineer F had an ethical obligation to disclose the contractor license revocation as well." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.93" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case148:Omission_Materiality_of_Contractor_License_Revocation_by_Engineer_F ;
proeth:discoveredincase "148" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T23:02:49.838777+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "148" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T23:02:49.838777+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer F" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Non-Engineering License Disciplinary History Employment Disclosure Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer F was obligated to disclose the revocation of his contractor's license — a non-engineering professional license — on the employment application, because the revocation resulted from an adjudicated finding of wrongdoing and reflected on his professional character and fitness for engineering practice." ;
proeth:sourcetext "The fact that the request by the employer related solely to having a license suspended or being disciplined in connection with the practice of professional engineering should have been of no consequence to Engineer F." ;
proeth:temporalscope "At the time of completing the employment application" ;
proeth:textreferences "BER Case 75-5 clearly indicates that the BER must look beyond just the specific practice of engineering to the whole person when addressing ethical issues relating to professional engineers.",
"The fact that the request by the employer related solely to having a license suspended or being disciplined in connection with the practice of professional engineering should have been of no consequence to Engineer F." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 148 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T23:11:08.580177"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 148 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
148
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T23:02:49.838777+00:00
First case
148
Generated
2026-02-28T23:02:49.838777+00:00
Attributed to
Case 148 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T23:11:08.580177
Generated by
ProEthica Case 148 Extraction