Private Power Company PE Legislative Witness
R · Role
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Private_Power_Company_PE_Legislative_Witness
Definition
Testified before the state legislative committee that his engineering analysis supports one high dam as a more effective and less expensive solution; submitted voluminous engineering data and criticized the opposing engineer's analysis.
Properties
Instance of
PrivateCompanyLegislativeHearingWitnessEngineer
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PrivateCompanyLegislativeHearingWitnessEngineer
Attributes
| license | Professional Engineer |
| affiliation | Private Power Company |
| specialty | Water supply, flood control, and power infrastructure engineering |
| testimony_position | Single high dam as optimal and more economical solution |
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Relationships
| type | peer_adversary |
| target | State Power Commission PE Legislative Witness |
| type | represents |
| target | Private Power Company |
| type | testifies_before |
| target | State Legislature Committee |
Role category
provider_client
Relationships
adheresToPrinciple
Adverse Technical Finding Non-Equivalence — Legislative Dam Analysis Criticism, Competing Public Goods Balancing — Water Supply Flood Control Power Production, Dual-Advocate Legislative Peer Criticism Permissibility — Dam Testimony, Engineer Public Testimony Role — Legislative Infrastructure Hearing, Engineering Opinion Indeterminacy — Dam Configuration Cost and Growth Estimates, Environmental and Infrastructure Policy Subjective Balancing — Dam Design Alternatives, Environmental and Infrastructure Policy Subjective Balancing — Water-Power Complex Multiple Approaches, Good Faith Public Welfare Sincerity — Private Power Company PE Testimony, Honest Disagreement Permissibility — Dam Configuration Legislative Testimony, Honest Disagreement Permissibility — Low Dams vs. High Dam Engineering Positions, Legislative Hearing Technical Testimony Objectivity — Dam Configuration Competing Analyses, Loyalty to Client With in Ethical Limits — Dual Legislative Advocacy, Objectivity Obligation — Data-Grounded Legislative Testimony, Public Interest Peer Critique Deportment — Mutual Legislative Criticism, Public Policy Engineering Debate Open Resolution — Dam Design Legislative Hearing, Public Policy Engineering Debate Open Resolution — Legislature as Proper Decision Authority, Retained Engineer Advocacy-Objectivity Balance — Private Power Company PE
hasObligation
Private Power Company PE Competing Public Goods Balanced Advisory, Private Power Company PE Data Submission Completeness, Private Power Company PE Fact-Grounded High-Dam Opinion, Private Power Company PE Legislative Testimony Objectivity, Private Power Company PE Legislative Witness — Estimate-Based Indeterminacy Acknowledgment, Private Power Company PE Peer Criticism Professional Deportment, Private Power Company PE — Canon 24 Due-Restraint Peer Criticism, Private Power Company PE — Canon 24 Forum Non-Interference with Legislative Duty, Private Power Company PE — Competing Public Goods Balanced Legislative Testimony, Private Power Company PE — Honest Conviction Advocacy Prerequisite
Source Evidence
Source text
Another professional engineer, representing a private power company, testifies that his engineering analysis indicates a more effective and less expensive solution, producing the same results, by using one high dam
Text references
Another professional engineer, representing a private power company, testifies that his engineering analysis indicates a more effective and less expensive solution, producing the same results, by using one high dam
Each engineering witness submits voluminous engineering data in support of his position
freely criticizes the analysis and findings of the other
TTL
@prefix case114: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case114:Private_Power_Company_PE_Legislative_Witness a proeth:PrivateCompanyLegislativeHearingWitnessEngineer,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Private Power Company PE Legislative Witness" ;
proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Adverse_Technical_Finding_Non-Equivalence_—_Legislative_Dam_Analysis_Criticism>,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Competing_Public_Goods_Balancing_—_Water_Supply_Flood_Control_Power_Production>,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Dual-Advocate_Legislative_Peer_Criticism_Permissibility_—_Dam_Testimony>,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Engineer_Public_Testimony_Role_—_Legislative_Infrastructure_Hearing>,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Engineering_Opinion_Indeterminacy_—_Dam_Configuration_Cost_and_Growth_Estimates>,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Environmental_and_Infrastructure_Policy_Subjective_Balancing_—_Dam_Design_Alternatives>,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Environmental_and_Infrastructure_Policy_Subjective_Balancing_—_Water-Power_Complex_Multiple_Approaches>,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Good_Faith_Public_Welfare_Sincerity_—_Private_Power_Company_PE_Testimony>,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Honest_Disagreement_Permissibility_—_Dam_Configuration_Legislative_Testimony>,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Honest_Disagreement_Permissibility_—_Low_Dams_vs._High_Dam_Engineering_Positions>,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Legislative_Hearing_Technical_Testimony_Objectivity_—_Dam_Configuration_Competing_Analyses>,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Loyalty_to_Client_Within_Ethical_Limits_—_Dual_Legislative_Advocacy>,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Objectivity_Obligation_—_Data-Grounded_Legislative_Testimony>,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Public_Interest_Peer_Critique_Deportment_—_Mutual_Legislative_Criticism>,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Public_Policy_Engineering_Debate_Open_Resolution_—_Dam_Design_Legislative_Hearing>,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Public_Policy_Engineering_Debate_Open_Resolution_—_Legislature_as_Proper_Decision_Authority>,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Retained_Engineer_Advocacy-Objectivity_Balance_—_Private_Power_Company_PE> ;
proeth-core:hasObligation case114:Private_Power_Company_PE_Competing_Public_Goods_Balanced_Advisory,
case114:Private_Power_Company_PE_Data_Submission_Completeness,
case114:Private_Power_Company_PE_Fact-Grounded_High-Dam_Opinion,
case114:Private_Power_Company_PE_Legislative_Testimony_Objectivity,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Private_Power_Company_PE_Legislative_Witness_—_Estimate-Based_Indeterminacy_Acknowledgment>,
case114:Private_Power_Company_PE_Peer_Criticism_Professional_Deportment,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Private_Power_Company_PE_—_Canon_24_Due-Restraint_Peer_Criticism>,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Private_Power_Company_PE_—_Canon_24_Forum_Non-Interference_with_Legislative_Duty>,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Private_Power_Company_PE_—_Competing_Public_Goods_Balanced_Legislative_Testimony>,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Private_Power_Company_PE_—_Honest_Conviction_Advocacy_Prerequisite> ;
proeth:attributes "{'license': 'Professional Engineer', 'affiliation': 'Private Power Company', 'specialty': 'Water supply, flood control, and power infrastructure engineering', 'testimony_position': 'Single high dam as optimal and more economical solution'}" ;
proeth:caseinvolvement "Testified before the state legislative committee that his engineering analysis supports one high dam as a more effective and less expensive solution; submitted voluminous engineering data and criticized the opposing engineer's analysis." ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "114" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T15:15:25.989723+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "114" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T15:15:25.989723+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:relationships "{'type': 'peer_adversary', 'target': 'State Power Commission PE Legislative Witness'}",
"{'type': 'represents', 'target': 'Private Power Company'}",
"{'type': 'testifies_before', 'target': 'State Legislature Committee'}" ;
proeth:rolecategory "provider_client" ;
proeth:roleclass "Private Company Legislative Hearing Witness Engineer" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Another professional engineer, representing a private power company, testifies that his engineering analysis indicates a more effective and less expensive solution, producing the same results, by using one high dam" ;
proeth:textreferences "Another professional engineer, representing a private power company, testifies that his engineering analysis indicates a more effective and less expensive solution, producing the same results, by using one high dam",
"Each engineering witness submits voluminous engineering data in support of his position",
"freely criticizes the analysis and findings of the other" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 114 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T15:38:37.728731"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 114 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
114
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-02T15:15:25.989723+00:00
First case
114
Generated
2026-03-02T15:15:25.989723+00:00
Attributed to
Case 114 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T15:38:37.728731
Generated by
ProEthica Case 114 Extraction