Private Power Company PE Legislative Witness — Estimate-Based Indeterminacy Acknowledgment
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Private_Power_Company_PE_Legislative_Witness_—_Estimate-Based_Indeterminacy_Acknowledgment
Properties
Instance of
EngineeringOpinionEstimate-BasedIndeterminacyHonestAcknowledgmentObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EngineeringOpinionEstimate-BasedIndeterminacyHonestAcknowledgmentObligation
Case context
Private Power Company PE testified before the state legislative committee on water supply, flood control, and electric power production, advocating for one high dam as a more effective and less expensive solution.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.82
Importance
high
Obligated party
Private Power Company PE Legislative Witness
Obligation statement
The Private Power Company PE, in testifying before the state legislative committee that one high dam is more effective and less expensive, was obligated to acknowledge that this conclusion rests on estimates of indeterminate factors including construction cost, population growth, economic development, and future equipment efficiency trends, rather than presenting the conclusion as settled engineering fact.
Temporal scope
During legislative committee testimony
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Water-Power Complex Indeterminate Fact or Estimation
derivedFromPrinciple
Engineering Opinion Indeterminacy — Dam Configuration Cost and Growth Estimates
Source Evidence
Source text
it should be recognized that in the type of case at hand the engineers must base their opinion on estimates of indeterminate factors, e.g., construction cost by one method or another, population growth, economic development of the area and possible future trends in more efficient equipment
Text references
Rule 10 refers to the engineer being an 'advocate' of a position, again recognizing that contrary conclusions are to be expected
it should be recognized that in the type of case at hand the engineers must base their opinion on estimates of indeterminate factors, e.g., construction cost by one method or another, population growth, economic development of the area and possible future trends in more efficient equipment
TTL
@prefix case114: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Private_Power_Company_PE_Legislative_Witness_—_Estimate-Based_Indeterminacy_Acknowledgment> a proeth:EngineeringOpinionEstimate-BasedIndeterminacyHonestAcknowledgmentObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Private Power Company PE Legislative Witness — Estimate-Based Indeterminacy Acknowledgment" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case114:Private_Power_Company_PE_Fact-Grounded_High-Dam_Opinion ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case114:Water-Power_Complex_Indeterminate_Factor_Estimation ;
proeth:casecontext "Private Power Company PE testified before the state legislative committee on water supply, flood control, and electric power production, advocating for one high dam as a more effective and less expensive solution." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.82" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/114#Engineering_Opinion_Indeterminacy_—_Dam_Configuration_Cost_and_Growth_Estimates> ;
proeth:discoveredincase "114" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T15:30:18.471831+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "114" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T15:30:18.471831+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Private Power Company PE Legislative Witness" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Engineering Opinion Estimate-Based Indeterminacy Honest Acknowledgment Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "The Private Power Company PE, in testifying before the state legislative committee that one high dam is more effective and less expensive, was obligated to acknowledge that this conclusion rests on estimates of indeterminate factors including construction cost, population growth, economic development, and future equipment efficiency trends, rather than presenting the conclusion as settled engineering fact." ;
proeth:sourcetext "it should be recognized that in the type of case at hand the engineers must base their opinion on estimates of indeterminate factors, e.g., construction cost by one method or another, population growth, economic development of the area and possible future trends in more efficient equipment" ;
proeth:temporalscope "During legislative committee testimony" ;
proeth:textreferences "Rule 10 refers to the engineer being an 'advocate' of a position, again recognizing that contrary conclusions are to be expected",
"it should be recognized that in the type of case at hand the engineers must base their opinion on estimates of indeterminate factors, e.g., construction cost by one method or another, population growth, economic development of the area and possible future trends in more efficient equipment" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 114 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T15:38:37.747979"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 114 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
114
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-02T15:30:18.471831+00:00
First case
114
Generated
2026-03-02T15:30:18.471831+00:00
Attributed to
Case 114 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T15:38:37.747979
Generated by
ProEthica Case 114 Extraction