Engineer A Withdrawal After Owner Refusal BER Case 18-9
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Engineer_A_Withdrawal_After_Owner_Refusal_BER_Case_18-9
Properties
Instance of
ConditionalProjectWithdrawalAfterClientRefusalofSafetyDisclosureObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ConditionalProjectWithdrawalAfterClientRefusalofSafetyDisclosureObligation
Case context
Engineer A advocated for design to the 100-year storm surge elevation based on newly identified historic weather data and public safety risks; the owner refused to agree that such protection was required or appropriate.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.89
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A (BER Case 18-9)
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to withdraw from the residential development project after the owner refused to agree to design the project for the then-projected 100-year storm surge elevation, following Engineer A's continued attempts to convince the owner of the potential for damage to future residents and the public.
Temporal scope
After exhausting attempts to convince the owner of the need for the higher design standard
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Climate-Informed Infrastructure Design Standard Invoked by BER Case 18-9 Precedent
Source Evidence
Source text
The BER concluded that Engineer A should continue to attempt to convince the owner of the potential for damage to future residents and the public, and, failing agreement on Engineer A's proposed design standard, Engineer A should withdraw from the project.
Text references
The BER concluded that Engineer A should continue to attempt to convince the owner of the potential for damage to future residents and the public, and, failing agreement on Engineer A's proposed design standard, Engineer A should withdraw from the project.
TTL
@prefix case88: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case88:Engineer_A_Withdrawal_After_Owner_Refusal_BER_Case_18-9 a proeth:ConditionalProjectWithdrawalAfterClientRefusalofSafetyDisclosureObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Withdrawal After Owner Refusal BER Case 18-9" ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case88:Engineer_A_BER_18-9_Graduated_Escalation_Coastal_Development_Withdrawal ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A advocated for design to the 100-year storm surge elevation based on newly identified historic weather data and public safety risks; the owner refused to agree that such protection was required or appropriate." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.89" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case88:Climate-Informed_Infrastructure_Design_Standard_Invoked_by_BER_Case_18-9_Precedent ;
proeth:discoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-26T00:21:20.043237+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-26T00:21:20.043237+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (BER Case 18-9)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Conditional Project Withdrawal After Client Refusal of Safety Disclosure Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to withdraw from the residential development project after the owner refused to agree to design the project for the then-projected 100-year storm surge elevation, following Engineer A's continued attempts to convince the owner of the potential for damage to future residents and the public." ;
proeth:sourcetext "The BER concluded that Engineer A should continue to attempt to convince the owner of the potential for damage to future residents and the public, and, failing agreement on Engineer A's proposed design standard, Engineer A should withdraw from the project." ;
proeth:temporalscope "After exhausting attempts to convince the owner of the need for the higher design standard" ;
proeth:textreferences "The BER concluded that Engineer A should continue to attempt to convince the owner of the potential for damage to future residents and the public, and, failing agreement on Engineer A's proposed design standard, Engineer A should withdraw from the project." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 88 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-26T00:31:11.073145"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 88 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
88
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-26T00:21:20.043237+00:00
First case
88
Generated
2026-02-26T00:21:20.043237+00:00
Attributed to
Case 88 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-26T00:31:11.073145
Generated by
ProEthica Case 88 Extraction