Climate-Informed Infrastructure Design Standard Invoked by BER Case 18-9 Precedent
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Climate-Informed_Infrastructure_Design_Standard_Invoked_by_BER_Case_18-9_Precedent
Properties
Instance of
Climate-InformedInfrastructureDesignStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Climate-InformedInfrastructureDesignStandard
Applied to
100-year storm surge design standard
Coastal residential development hydrodynamic modeling
Balancing with
Client Loyalty
Faithful Agent Obligation Within Ethical Limits
Concrete expression
In BER Case 18-9, Engineer A performed hydrodynamic modeling and coastal risk assessment and advocated for design to the then-projected 100-year storm surge elevation based on updated historic weather data — establishing the precedent that engineers designing climate-sensitive infrastructure must incorporate current climate projections even when owners resist.
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Interpretation
In the BER Case 18-9 context, the climate-informed design standard required Engineer A to advocate for a design standard based on updated climate projections rather than accepting the owner's position that lower projections were adequate.
Invoked by
BER Case 18-9 Engineer A Climate-Aware Coastal Infrastructure Engineer
Tension resolution
Climate-informed design standard overrides owner preference for lower design standard; Engineer A must advocate for updated standard and withdraw if owner refuses.
Source Evidence
Source text
Based on newly identified historic weather data, Engineer A advocated that the project be designed for the then-projected 100-year storm surge elevation due to public safety risks even at lower projections.
Text references
Based on newly identified historic weather data, Engineer A advocated that the project be designed for the then-projected 100-year storm surge elevation due to public safety risks even at lower projections.
In BER Case 18-9, Engineer A worked for a developer to perform hydrodynamic modeling and coastal risk assessment regarding a proposed residential development.
The BER concluded that Engineer A should continue to attempt to convince the owner of the potential for damage to future residents and the public, and, failing agreement on Engineer A's proposed design standard, Engineer A should withdraw from the project.
The Owner refused to agree that such protection was required or appropriate.
TTL
@prefix case88: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case88:Climate-Informed_Infrastructure_Design_Standard_Invoked_by_BER_Case_18-9_Precedent a proeth:Climate-InformedInfrastructureDesignStandard,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Climate-Informed Infrastructure Design Standard Invoked by BER Case 18-9 Precedent" ;
proeth:appliedto "100-year storm surge design standard",
"Coastal residential development hydrodynamic modeling" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Client Loyalty",
"Faithful Agent Obligation Within Ethical Limits" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "In BER Case 18-9, Engineer A performed hydrodynamic modeling and coastal risk assessment and advocated for design to the then-projected 100-year storm surge elevation based on updated historic weather data — establishing the precedent that engineers designing climate-sensitive infrastructure must incorporate current climate projections even when owners resist." ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T14:20:08.457238+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T14:20:08.457238+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "In the BER Case 18-9 context, the climate-informed design standard required Engineer A to advocate for a design standard based on updated climate projections rather than accepting the owner's position that lower projections were adequate." ;
proeth:invokedby "BER Case 18-9 Engineer A Climate-Aware Coastal Infrastructure Engineer" ;
proeth:principleclass "Climate-Informed Infrastructure Design Standard" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Based on newly identified historic weather data, Engineer A advocated that the project be designed for the then-projected 100-year storm surge elevation due to public safety risks even at lower projections." ;
proeth:tensionresolution "Climate-informed design standard overrides owner preference for lower design standard; Engineer A must advocate for updated standard and withdraw if owner refuses." ;
proeth:textreferences "Based on newly identified historic weather data, Engineer A advocated that the project be designed for the then-projected 100-year storm surge elevation due to public safety risks even at lower projections.",
"In BER Case 18-9, Engineer A worked for a developer to perform hydrodynamic modeling and coastal risk assessment regarding a proposed residential development.",
"The BER concluded that Engineer A should continue to attempt to convince the owner of the potential for damage to future residents and the public, and, failing agreement on Engineer A's proposed design standard, Engineer A should withdraw from the project.",
"The Owner refused to agree that such protection was required or appropriate." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 88 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T10:32:26.862474"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 88 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
88
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T14:20:08.457238+00:00
First case
88
Generated
2026-02-27T14:20:08.457238+00:00
Attributed to
Case 88 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T10:32:26.862474
Generated by
ProEthica Case 88 Extraction