Engineer A Section III.4 Client-Transmitted Confidentiality Engagement Recognition

@prefix case84: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/84#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case84:Engineer_A_Section_III.4_Client-Transmitted_Confidentiality_Engagement_Recognition a proeth:SectionIII.4ConfidentialityClient-TransmittedInformationEngagementObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Section III.4 Client-Transmitted Confidentiality Engagement Recognition" ; proeth-core:competesWith case84:Engineer_A_Appropriate_Authority_Notification_After_Client_Safety_Override_Failure, case84:Engineer_A_Client_Safety_Violation_Insistence_or_Project_Withdrawal, case84:Engineer_A_Client_Safety_Violation_Insistence_or_Withdrawal_Failure, case84:Engineer_A_Competing_Confidentiality_Safety_Code_Provision_Contextual_Balancing, case84:Engineer_A_Confidentiality_Agreement_Non-Excuse_Safety_Code_Violation_Reporting, case84:Engineer_A_Faithful_Agent_Role_Misapplication_to_Confidentiality_Absolutism, case84:Engineer_A_Occupied_Building_Electrical_Mechanical_Violation_Occupant_Escalation, case84:Engineer_A_Out-of-Discipline_Electrical_Mechanical_Code_Violation_Public_Authority_Reporting, case84:Engineer_A_Passive_Acquiescence_Known_Safety_Violation_Independent_Ethical_Failure, case84:Engineer_A_Post-Client-Override_Public_Safety_Escalation_Failure, case84:Engineer_A_Tenant_Occupant_Direct_Notification_Electrical_Mechanical_Violations ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case84:Confidentiality_Obligation_vs._Occupant_Safety_Competing_Duties, case84:Engineer_A_Code-Based_Confidentiality_Exception_Activation, case84:Engineer_A_Confidentiality_vs._Public_Safety_Competing_Duties, case84:Engineer_A_Paramount_Safety_Obligation_Notification_Duty, case84:Out-of-Scope_Code_Violation_Disclosure_in_Occupied_Building_Sale, case84:Public_Safety_at_Risk_from_Known_Code_Violations_in_Occupied_Building ; proeth:casecontext "Client directly disclosed electrical and mechanical code violations to Engineer A during a structural assessment engagement conducted under a confidentiality agreement for a 60-year-old occupied apartment building being sold 'as is'." ; proeth:compliancestatus "partial" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.85" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case84:Confidentiality_Principle_Engaged_by_Client_Transmission_to_Engineer_A, case84:Confidentiality_Source-of-Information_Distinction_Applied_To_Client_Voluntary_Disclosure ; proeth:discoveredincase "84" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T13:47:29.003693+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "84" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T13:47:29.003693+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ; proeth:obligationclass "Section III.4 Confidentiality Client-Transmitted Information Engagement Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to recognize that Section III.4's confidentiality obligation was fully engaged because the electrical and mechanical deficiency information was directly and voluntarily transmitted by the client during the professional engagement, creating a heightened confidentiality expectation that had to be weighed — but not treated as absolute — against the paramount public safety obligation." ; proeth:sourcetext "In Case 82-2, there was no transmission of confidential information by the client to the engineer. However, under the facts of the present case, there was a transmission of confidential information by the client to Engineer A. Therefore, it would appear that Section III.4. should be involved in our consideration of this case." ; proeth:temporalscope "Upon receipt of client-transmitted confidential safety information during the professional engagement" ; proeth:textreferences "In Case 82-2, there was no transmission of confidential information by the client to the engineer. However, under the facts of the present case, there was a transmission of confidential information by the client to Engineer A. Therefore, it would appear that Section III.4. should be involved in our consideration of this case." ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 84 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T13:56:58.175656"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 84 Extraction" .