Engineer A Client Safety Violation Insistence or Project Withdrawal
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/84#Engineer_A_Client_Safety_Violation_Insistence_or_Project_Withdrawal
Properties
Instance of
ClientSafetyViolationInsistenceorProjectWithdrawalObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientSafetyViolationInsistenceorProjectWithdrawalObligation
Case context
The client made clear the building would be sold 'as is' with no remedial action. Engineer A did not insist on remediation and did not withdraw from the project, instead completing the structural report with only a brief mention of the deficiencies.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to insist that the client remediate the electrical and mechanical code violations before completing the structural engagement, or — if the client continued to refuse — to withdraw from the project rather than passively completing the structural report while known safety violations remained unaddressed.
Temporal scope
After the client's 'as is' sale directive became clear and before completion of the structural report
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Client As-Is Sale No Remediation Intent Active
Source Evidence
Source text
the client makes clear to Engineer A that the building is being sold 'as is' and he is not planning to take any remedial action
Text references
Engineer A does not report the safety violations to any third party
the client makes clear to Engineer A that the building is being sold 'as is' and he is not planning to take any remedial action
TTL
@prefix case84: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/84#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case84:Engineer_A_Client_Safety_Violation_Insistence_or_Project_Withdrawal a proeth:ClientSafetyViolationInsistenceorProjectWithdrawalObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Client Safety Violation Insistence or Project Withdrawal" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case84:Engineer_A_Section_III.4_Client-Transmitted_Confidentiality_Engagement_Recognition ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case84:Client_As-Is_Sale_No_Remediation_Intent_Active ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case84:Engineer_A_Section_III.4_Client-Transmitted_Confidentiality_Engagement_Recognition ;
proeth:casecontext "The client made clear the building would be sold 'as is' with no remedial action. Engineer A did not insist on remediation and did not withdraw from the project, instead completing the structural report with only a brief mention of the deficiencies." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/84#Insistence_on_Client_Remedial_Action_or_Withdrawal_—_Engineer_A_Obligation>,
case84:Non-Acquiescence_to_Unsafe_Client_Directive_Violated_By_Engineer_A ;
proeth:discoveredincase "84" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T13:38:59.518980+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "84" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T13:38:59.518980+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Client Safety Violation Insistence or Project Withdrawal Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to insist that the client remediate the electrical and mechanical code violations before completing the structural engagement, or — if the client continued to refuse — to withdraw from the project rather than passively completing the structural report while known safety violations remained unaddressed." ;
proeth:sourcetext "the client makes clear to Engineer A that the building is being sold 'as is' and he is not planning to take any remedial action" ;
proeth:temporalscope "After the client's 'as is' sale directive became clear and before completion of the structural report" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A does not report the safety violations to any third party",
"the client makes clear to Engineer A that the building is being sold 'as is' and he is not planning to take any remedial action" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 84 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T13:56:58.150866"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 84 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
84
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T13:38:59.518980+00:00
First case
84
Generated
2026-03-01T13:38:59.518980+00:00
Attributed to
Case 84 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T13:56:58.150866
Generated by
ProEthica Case 84 Extraction