Engineer A Tenant Occupant Direct Notification Electrical Mechanical Violations
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/84#Engineer_A_Tenant_Occupant_Direct_Notification_Electrical_Mechanical_Violations
Properties
Instance of
TenantImminentStructuralDangerDirectNotificationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#TenantImminentStructuralDangerDirectNotificationObligation
Case context
The building was occupied at the time of Engineer A's engagement. The client intended to sell 'as is' without remediation. The occupants were exposed to injury risk from electrical and mechanical code violations that Engineer A knew about but did not disclose to any third party, including the occupants.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.84
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to consider directly notifying the building occupants of the electrical and mechanical code violations that could cause them injury, recognizing that the occupants are identifiable third parties directly exposed to the hazard and that no other party was positioned to protect them given the client's 'as is' sale intent.
Temporal scope
Upon learning of the electrical and mechanical code violations and their potential to injure occupants
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Confidential Structural Engagement Agreement Active
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A is retained to investigate the structural integrity of a 60 year old occupied apartment building
Text references
Engineer A does not report the safety violations to any third party
Engineer A does realize those deficiencies could cause injury to the occupants of the building
Engineer A is retained to investigate the structural integrity of a 60 year old occupied apartment building
the building contains deficiencies in the electrical and mechanical systems which violate applicable codes and standards
TTL
@prefix case84: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/84#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case84:Engineer_A_Tenant_Occupant_Direct_Notification_Electrical_Mechanical_Violations a proeth:TenantImminentStructuralDangerDirectNotificationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Tenant Occupant Direct Notification Electrical Mechanical Violations" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case84:Engineer_A_Section_III.4_Client-Transmitted_Confidentiality_Engagement_Recognition ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case84:Confidential_Structural_Engagement_Agreement_Active ;
proeth:casecontext "The building was occupied at the time of Engineer A's engagement. The client intended to sell 'as is' without remediation. The occupants were exposed to injury risk from electrical and mechanical code violations that Engineer A knew about but did not disclose to any third party, including the occupants." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.84" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case84:Third-Party_Affected_Party_Direct_Notification_Obligation_Not_Discharged_By_Engineer_A ;
proeth:discoveredincase "84" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T13:38:59.518980+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "84" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T13:38:59.518980+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Tenant Imminent Structural Danger Direct Notification Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to consider directly notifying the building occupants of the electrical and mechanical code violations that could cause them injury, recognizing that the occupants are identifiable third parties directly exposed to the hazard and that no other party was positioned to protect them given the client's 'as is' sale intent." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A is retained to investigate the structural integrity of a 60 year old occupied apartment building" ;
proeth:temporalscope "Upon learning of the electrical and mechanical code violations and their potential to injure occupants" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A does not report the safety violations to any third party",
"Engineer A does realize those deficiencies could cause injury to the occupants of the building",
"Engineer A is retained to investigate the structural integrity of a 60 year old occupied apartment building",
"the building contains deficiencies in the electrical and mechanical systems which violate applicable codes and standards" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 84 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T13:56:58.151225"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 84 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
84
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T13:38:59.518980+00:00
First case
84
Generated
2026-03-01T13:38:59.518980+00:00
Attributed to
Case 84 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T13:56:58.151225
Generated by
ProEthica Case 84 Extraction