Engineer B Prior-Firm Project Credit Engineer

@prefix case19: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/19#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case19:Engineer_B_Prior-Firm_Project_Credit_Engineer a proeth:Multi-StateProjectManagerMarketingEngineer, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer B Prior-Firm Project Credit Engineer" ; proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple case19:Honesty_in_Professional_Representations_Applied_to_Engineer_B_Attribution, case19:Intellectual_Integrity_in_Authorship_Invoked_By_Engineer_B_Prior_Employer_Projects, case19:Qualification_Proposal_Attribution_Integrity_Applied_to_Engineer_B_State_Z, case19:Transparency_Principle_Invoked_By_XYZ_Engineers_Prefatory_Notice ; proeth-core:hasObligation case19:Engineer_B_Maximum_Clarity_Attribution_State_Q_Proposal, case19:Engineer_B_Prior_Employer_Credit_Scope_Limitation_State_Q_State_Z, case19:Engineer_B_Project-Level_Attribution_State_Z_Proposal, case19:Honesty_in_Professional_Representations_Obligation_XYZ_Engineers_Qualification_Proposals_Both_States, case19:Jurisdiction-Specific_Licensing_Rule_Compliance_Obligation_XYZ_Engineers_Engineer_B_Both_States, case19:Prior-Employer_Project_Credit_Scope_Limitation_Obligation_Engineer_B_XYZ_Engineers_State_Z, case19:Project-Level_Attribution_Obligation_XYZ_Engineers_Engineer_B_State_Z_Proposals, case19:Qualification_Proposal_Misrepresentation_Non-Commission_Obligation_XYZ_Engineers_State_Q ; proeth:attributes "{'license': 'Professional Engineer', 'current_employer': 'XYZ Engineers', 'prior_employer': 'Previous unnamed firm', 'violation_finding': 'Misconduct under State Z rules; no misrepresentation under State Q rules'}" ; proeth:caseinvolvement "Engineer B, now employed at XYZ Engineers, included projects completed under a prior employer in qualification proposals submitted in State Q and State Z, providing a general qualifier about prior employment but failing to repeat the attribution adjacent to each specific project listing as required by State Z's rules, constituting misconduct under State Z's licensing board rules." ; proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ; proeth:confidence "0.9" ; proeth:discoveredincase "19" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T15:41:30.444497+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "19" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T15:41:30.444497+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:relationships "{'type': 'employed_by', 'target': 'XYZ Engineers'}", "{'type': 'peer', 'target': 'Engineer A'}", "{'type': 'subject_of_report', 'target': 'State Z Engineering Licensing Board'}" ; proeth:rolecategory "provider_client" ; proeth:roleclass "Multi-State Project Manager Marketing Engineer" ; proeth:sourcetext "XYZ Engineers' proposal clearly indicated that Engineer B was in responsible charge of certain listed projects while in the previous employment of another firm" ; proeth:textreferences "State Z's rules require that next to the specific project listing, the previous firm be named and that Engineer B's specific role on that project be clearly described", "That qualifier was not repeated within the specific descriptions of each of those projects", "XYZ Engineers' proposal clearly indicated that Engineer B was in responsible charge of certain listed projects while in the previous employment of another firm", "constituted misconduct on the part of both the individual and the firm" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 19 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T15:58:57.760944"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 19 Extraction" .