Honesty in Professional Representations Applied to Engineer B Attribution
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/19#Honesty_in_Professional_Representations_Applied_to_Engineer_B_Attribution
Properties
Instance of
HonestyinProfessionalRepresentations
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#HonestyinProfessionalRepresentations
Applied to
XYZ Engineers qualification proposals in State Q and State Z
Balancing with
Client Loyalty
Qualification Proposal Attribution Integrity
Concrete expression
Engineer B's obligation to be honest in qualification proposals required clear and complete attribution of prior-employer projects, including the prior firm's name and Engineer B's specific role, so that prospective clients could accurately assess the qualifications being represented
Confidence
0.89
Importance
high
Interpretation
Honesty in professional representations extends to the completeness and prominence of attribution in qualification proposals, not merely the technical accuracy of the information provided
Invoked by
Engineer B Prior-Firm Project Credit Engineer
Tension resolution
The honesty obligation required Engineer B to provide sufficiently prominent and specific attribution to avoid misleading prospective clients, with State Z's rules providing a concrete specification of what that obligation required
Source Evidence
Source text
Ethical practice would guide Engineer B to be as clear as possible in the differentiation of the two firms' project responsibilities
Text references
Ethical practice would guide Engineer B to be as clear as possible in the differentiation of the two firms' project responsibilities
XYZ Engineers' proposal clearly indicated that Engineer B was in responsible charge of certain listed projects while in the previous employment of another firm. That qualifier was not repeated within the specific descriptions of each of those projects
TTL
@prefix case19: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/19#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case19:Honesty_in_Professional_Representations_Applied_to_Engineer_B_Attribution a proeth:HonestyinProfessionalRepresentations,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Honesty in Professional Representations Applied to Engineer B Attribution" ;
proeth:appliedto "XYZ Engineers qualification proposals in State Q and State Z" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Client Loyalty",
"Qualification Proposal Attribution Integrity" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "Engineer B's obligation to be honest in qualification proposals required clear and complete attribution of prior-employer projects, including the prior firm's name and Engineer B's specific role, so that prospective clients could accurately assess the qualifications being represented" ;
proeth:confidence "0.89" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "19" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T15:48:43.533535+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "19" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T15:48:43.533535+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "Honesty in professional representations extends to the completeness and prominence of attribution in qualification proposals, not merely the technical accuracy of the information provided" ;
proeth:invokedby "Engineer B Prior-Firm Project Credit Engineer" ;
proeth:principleclass "Honesty in Professional Representations" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Ethical practice would guide Engineer B to be as clear as possible in the differentiation of the two firms' project responsibilities" ;
proeth:tensionresolution "The honesty obligation required Engineer B to provide sufficiently prominent and specific attribution to avoid misleading prospective clients, with State Z's rules providing a concrete specification of what that obligation required" ;
proeth:textreferences "Ethical practice would guide Engineer B to be as clear as possible in the differentiation of the two firms' project responsibilities",
"XYZ Engineers' proposal clearly indicated that Engineer B was in responsible charge of certain listed projects while in the previous employment of another firm. That qualifier was not repeated within the specific descriptions of each of those projects" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 19 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T15:58:57.771684"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 19 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
19
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-25T15:48:43.533535+00:00
First case
19
Generated
2026-02-25T15:48:43.533535+00:00
Attributed to
Case 19 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-25T15:58:57.771684
Generated by
ProEthica Case 19 Extraction