Project-Level Attribution Obligation XYZ Engineers Engineer B State Z Proposals
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/19#Project-Level_Attribution_Obligation_XYZ_Engineers_Engineer_B_State_Z_Proposals
Properties
Instance of
Project-LevelAttributioninQualificationProposalsObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Project-LevelAttributioninQualificationProposalsObligation
Case context
XYZ Engineers submitted qualification proposals in State Z that included Engineer B's prior-employer projects with a prefatory attribution notice at the section level but without project-level attribution adjacent to each individual project description in the lengthy individual descriptions.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer B and XYZ Engineers
Obligation statement
Engineer B and XYZ Engineers were obligated, when listing Engineer B's prior-employer bridge and culvert projects in qualification proposals submitted in State Z, to include next to each specific project listing detailed information naming the prior employer and Engineer B's specific involvement in the project — not merely a prefatory notice at the beginning of the individual qualification section.
Temporal scope
At the time of preparation and submission of qualification proposals in State Z
Source Evidence
Source text
at the beginning of an individual qualification section, Engineer B's projects for a different firm are identified as a part of Engineer B's experience, identifying the prior employer and the associated client for each project
Text references
any list of such projects must include, next to the specific project listing, detailed information naming the previous firm and the licensee's specific involvement in the project
at the beginning of an individual qualification section, Engineer B's projects for a different firm are identified as a part of Engineer B's experience, identifying the prior employer and the associated client for each project
this notice was not included in all paragraphs of the lengthy individual descriptions of those projects
TTL
@prefix case19: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/19#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case19:Project-Level_Attribution_Obligation_XYZ_Engineers_Engineer_B_State_Z_Proposals a proeth:Project-LevelAttributioninQualificationProposalsObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Project-Level Attribution Obligation XYZ Engineers Engineer B State Z Proposals" ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case19:Qualification_Proposal_Misrepresentation_Non-Commission_Obligation_XYZ_Engineers_State_Q ;
proeth:casecontext "XYZ Engineers submitted qualification proposals in State Z that included Engineer B's prior-employer projects with a prefatory attribution notice at the section level but without project-level attribution adjacent to each individual project description in the lengthy individual descriptions." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case19:Qualification_Proposal_Attribution_Integrity_Applied_to_Engineer_B_State_Z,
case19:Transparency_Principle_Invoked_By_XYZ_Engineers_Prefatory_Notice ;
proeth:discoveredincase "19" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-25T15:45:16.126630+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "19" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-25T15:45:16.126630+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer B and XYZ Engineers" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Project-Level Attribution in Qualification Proposals Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer B and XYZ Engineers were obligated, when listing Engineer B's prior-employer bridge and culvert projects in qualification proposals submitted in State Z, to include next to each specific project listing detailed information naming the prior employer and Engineer B's specific involvement in the project — not merely a prefatory notice at the beginning of the individual qualification section." ;
proeth:sourcetext "at the beginning of an individual qualification section, Engineer B's projects for a different firm are identified as a part of Engineer B's experience, identifying the prior employer and the associated client for each project" ;
proeth:temporalscope "At the time of preparation and submission of qualification proposals in State Z" ;
proeth:textreferences "any list of such projects must include, next to the specific project listing, detailed information naming the previous firm and the licensee's specific involvement in the project",
"at the beginning of an individual qualification section, Engineer B's projects for a different firm are identified as a part of Engineer B's experience, identifying the prior employer and the associated client for each project",
"this notice was not included in all paragraphs of the lengthy individual descriptions of those projects" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 19 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-25T15:58:57.764839"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 19 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
19
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-25T15:45:16.126630+00:00
First case
19
Generated
2026-02-25T15:45:16.126630+00:00
Attributed to
Case 19 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-25T15:58:57.764839
Generated by
ProEthica Case 19 Extraction