Firm A City-Retained Development Inspection Engineer

@prefix case177: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/177#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case177:Firm_A_City-Retained_Development_Inspection_Engineer a proeth:City-RetainedDevelopmentInspectionEngineer, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Firm A City-Retained Development Inspection Engineer" ; proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/177#Client_Interest_Primacy_Violated_—_City_as_Firm_As_Principal>, case177:Disclosure_Insufficiency_for_Structural_Conflict_Affirmed_in_Firm_A, case177:Dual-Role_Conflict_Invoked_by_Firm_A_City_Inspection_Engagement, case177:Dual-Role_Conflict_of_Interest_Affirmed_for_Firm_A_City_Engineer_Inspection_Role, <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/177#Objectivity_Compromised_—_Firm_A_Inspection_of_Private_Developer_Clients>, <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/177#Public_Welfare_Paramount_—_Infrastructure_Inspection_Integrity> ; proeth-core:hasObligation case177:Firm_A_City-Retained_Engineer_Multi-Role_Conflict_Non-Engagement, case177:Firm_A_City_Infrastructure_Standard_Primacy_in_Inspection, case177:Firm_A_Compensating-Party_Benefiting-Party_Misalignment_Non-Engagement, case177:Firm_A_Developer_Client_Conflict_Disclosure_to_City, case177:Firm_A_Developer_Client_Conflict_Proactive_Disclosure_to_City, case177:Firm_A_Developer_Client_Inspection_Objectivity_Preservation, case177:Firm_A_Dual-Service_Private_Developer_Prohibition, case177:Firm_A_Faithful_Agent_City_Client_Interest_Primacy, case177:Firm_A_Inspection_Quality_Non-Subordination_to_Developer_Approval_Incentive, case177:Firm_A_Self-Design-Review_Prohibition ; proeth:attributes "{'entity_type': 'Private consulting engineering firm', 'retention_basis': 'City engagement for plan review and construction inspection', 'funding_source': 'Developer-paid fees passed through city', 'inspection_scope': 'City design standards compliance for infrastructure turnover'}" ; proeth:caseinvolvement "Private consulting engineering firm retained by the city to provide design review and construction inspection of private development projects, funded by developer fees, with inspection scope limited to ensuring city design standards are met for infrastructure to be turned over to the city." ; proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ; proeth:confidence "0.93" ; proeth:discoveredincase "177" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T09:08:00.321233+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "177" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T09:08:00.321233+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:relationships "{'type': 'funded_by', 'target': 'Private Developer'}", "{'type': 'inspects_construction_of', 'target': 'Private Developer'}", "{'type': 'retained_by', 'target': 'City'}", "{'type': 'reviews_plans_of', 'target': 'Private Developer'}" ; proeth:rolecategory "public_responsibility" ; proeth:roleclass "City-Retained Development Inspection Engineer" ; proeth:sourcetext "City engages the services of a private consulting engineering firm, Firm A, to provide design review and construction inspection" ; proeth:textreferences "City engages the services of a private consulting engineering firm, Firm A, to provide design review and construction inspection", "The developer must pay the city's expenses for having Firm A review the drawings", "inspection services, to be provided by Firm A on the city's behalf" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 177 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T09:35:05.768479"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 177 Extraction" .