Firm A City-Retained Engineer Multi-Role Conflict Non-Engagement

@prefix case177: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/177#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case177:Firm_A_City-Retained_Engineer_Multi-Role_Conflict_Non-Engagement a proeth:City-RetainedInspectionEngineerPrivateDeveloperDual-ServiceProhibitionObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Firm A City-Retained Engineer Multi-Role Conflict Non-Engagement" ; proeth-core:competesWith case177:BER-75-7_Commission_Member_Engineer_Abstention_Compliance, case177:BER-82-4_Engineer_A_Multi-Role_Review-Recommendation_Non-Decision_Boundary, case177:Firm_A_Developer_Client_Conflict_Disclosure_to_City, case177:Firm_A_Developer_Client_Conflict_Proactive_Disclosure_to_City ; proeth-core:prevailsOver case177:BER-74-2_Municipal_Engineer_Small_Municipality_Public_Interest_Dual-Role, case177:BER-82-4_Engineer_A_Multi-Role_Review-Recommendation_Non-Decision_Boundary, case177:Firm_A_Developer_Client_Conflict_Disclosure_to_City, case177:Firm_A_Developer_Client_Conflict_Proactive_Disclosure_to_City ; proeth:casecontext "Firm A is a private consulting engineering firm that regularly prepares drawings for developers and simultaneously reviews those drawings and performs inspection services at developer expense for the benefit of the city, in violation of NSPE Code Section II.4.d." ; proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.93" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case177:Dual-Role_Conflict_of_Interest_Affirmed_for_Firm_A_City_Engineer_Inspection_Role ; proeth:discoveredincase "177" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T09:23:17.458159+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "177" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T09:23:17.458159+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Firm A" ; proeth:obligationclass "City-Retained Inspection Engineer Private Developer Dual-Service Prohibition Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Firm A was obligated to refrain from simultaneously preparing drawings for private developers in a private capacity, reviewing those same drawings on behalf of the city, and performing construction inspection services for the city at developer expense — recognizing that this combination of roles creates an irreconcilable conflict of interest that prevents adequate representation of the city's interests." ; proeth:sourcetext "Firm A is a private consulting engineering firm that regularly prepares drawings for developers and at the same time reviews those drawings at developer expense for the benefit of the city, and also performs inspection services at developer expense for the benefit of the city." ; proeth:temporalscope "Throughout all concurrent private design and city inspection engagements" ; proeth:textreferences "Firm A is a private consulting engineering firm that regularly prepares drawings for developers and at the same time reviews those drawings at developer expense for the benefit of the city, and also performs inspection services at developer expense for the benefit of the city.", "The Board reaffirms the view that the circumstances described are in violation of Section II.4.d." ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 177 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T09:35:05.778002"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 177 Extraction" .