Firm A Self-Design-Review Prohibition

O · Obligation Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/177#Firm_A_Self-Design-Review_Prohibition
Properties
Instance of
City-RetainedEngineerSelf-Design-ReviewProhibitionObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#City-RetainedEngineerSelf-Design-ReviewProhibitionObligation
Case context
Firm A regularly prepared drawings for developers and then reviewed those same drawings on behalf of the city, creating a self-review situation that is structurally irreconcilable with the independent review function.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.89
Importance
high
Obligated party
Firm A
Obligation statement
Firm A was obligated to refrain from reviewing and inspecting, in its city-retained capacity, drawings and construction that Firm A itself prepared for private developers — constituting impermissible self-review that eliminated the independent engineering judgment the city's review function was designed to provide.
Temporal scope
Whenever Firm A reviewed or inspected work it had prepared in a private capacity
Source Evidence
Source text
Firm A is a private consulting engineering firm that regularly prepares drawings for developers and at the same time reviews those drawings at developer expense for the benefit of the city.

Text references
Firm A is a private consulting engineering firm that regularly prepares drawings for developers and at the same time reviews those drawings at developer expense for the benefit of the city.
TTL
@prefix case177: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/177#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case177:Firm_A_Self-Design-Review_Prohibition a proeth:City-RetainedEngineerSelf-Design-ReviewProhibitionObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Firm A Self-Design-Review Prohibition" ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/177#Firm_A_Multi-Role_Structural_Conflict_—_Design_Review_and_Inspection_for_Same_Parties> ; proeth-core:prevailsOver case177:Firm_A_Developer_Client_Inspection_Objectivity_Preservation ; proeth:casecontext "Firm A regularly prepared drawings for developers and then reviewed those same drawings on behalf of the city, creating a self-review situation that is structurally irreconcilable with the independent review function." ; proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.89" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case177:Dual-Role_Conflict_of_Interest_Affirmed_for_Firm_A_City_Engineer_Inspection_Role ; proeth:discoveredincase "177" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T09:23:17.458159+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "177" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T09:23:17.458159+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Firm A" ; proeth:obligationclass "City-Retained Engineer Self-Design-Review Prohibition Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Firm A was obligated to refrain from reviewing and inspecting, in its city-retained capacity, drawings and construction that Firm A itself prepared for private developers — constituting impermissible self-review that eliminated the independent engineering judgment the city's review function was designed to provide." ; proeth:sourcetext "Firm A is a private consulting engineering firm that regularly prepares drawings for developers and at the same time reviews those drawings at developer expense for the benefit of the city." ; proeth:temporalscope "Whenever Firm A reviewed or inspected work it had prepared in a private capacity" ; proeth:textreferences "Firm A is a private consulting engineering firm that regularly prepares drawings for developers and at the same time reviews those drawings at developer expense for the benefit of the city." ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 177 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T09:35:05.763542"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 177 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:27
Discovered in case
177
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T09:23:17.458159+00:00
First case
177
Generated
2026-03-01T09:23:17.458159+00:00
Attributed to
Case 177 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T09:35:05.763542
Generated by
ProEthica Case 177 Extraction