Engineer B Sealed Document Modification Documentation Obligation Case 82-5
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/173#Engineer_B_Sealed_Document_Modification_Documentation_Obligation_Case_82-5
Properties
Instance of
SealedDocumentModificationDocumentationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#SealedDocumentModificationDocumentationObligation
Case context
Engineer B made major design changes across both the 5-sheet grading plan set and the 38-sheet public improvement plan set but provided only a vague title-sheet notation claiming responsibility for 'revisions of the plans' without specifying what was revised.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer B (Successor Design Engineer)
Obligation statement
Engineer B was obligated to make all necessary notations of changes made to Engineer A's sealed plans — specifically identifying modifications to grading plans, housing pad elevations, street routing, storm drains, pipe dimensions, sewers, and utilities — so that all parties relying on the documents could determine precisely what was changed, by whom, and when.
Temporal scope
At the time of making each design modification to Engineer A's sealed plan sheets
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Engineer B Undocumented Redesign on Engineer A Plans
derivedFromPrinciple
Change Notation Specificity Violation by Engineer B on Title Sheet
Source Evidence
Source text
It is clear that Engineer B had an ethical obligation to make all necessary notations of changes which he had made with respect to the grading plans, housing pads, routing of streets, storm drains, pipe dimensions, sewers, and utilities. His failure to do so constituted a form of deception which places him in violation of Section III.3.a.
Text references
Engineer B's failure to state with specificity what those changes in fact were made such a notation on the title sheet virtually meaningless
It is clear that Engineer B had an ethical obligation to make all necessary notations of changes which he had made with respect to the grading plans, housing pads, routing of streets, storm drains, pipe dimensions, sewers, and utilities. His failure to do so constituted a form of deception which places him in violation of Section III.3.a.
TTL
@prefix case173: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/173#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case173:Engineer_B_Sealed_Document_Modification_Documentation_Obligation_Case_82-5 a proeth:SealedDocumentModificationDocumentationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Sealed Document Modification Documentation Obligation Case 82-5" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case173:Engineer_B_Vague_Title-Sheet_Disclaimer_Insufficiency_Public_Improvement_Plans ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case173:Engineer_B_Undocumented_Redesign_on_Engineer_A_Plans ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case173:Engineer_B_Vague_Title-Sheet_Disclaimer_Insufficiency_Public_Improvement_Plans ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer B made major design changes across both the 5-sheet grading plan set and the 38-sheet public improvement plan set but provided only a vague title-sheet notation claiming responsibility for 'revisions of the plans' without specifying what was revised." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case173:Change_Notation_Specificity_Violation_by_Engineer_B_on_Title_Sheet ;
proeth:discoveredincase "173" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T14:31:07.586453+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "173" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T14:31:07.586453+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer B (Successor Design Engineer)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Sealed Document Modification Documentation Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer B was obligated to make all necessary notations of changes made to Engineer A's sealed plans — specifically identifying modifications to grading plans, housing pad elevations, street routing, storm drains, pipe dimensions, sewers, and utilities — so that all parties relying on the documents could determine precisely what was changed, by whom, and when." ;
proeth:sourcetext "It is clear that Engineer B had an ethical obligation to make all necessary notations of changes which he had made with respect to the grading plans, housing pads, routing of streets, storm drains, pipe dimensions, sewers, and utilities. His failure to do so constituted a form of deception which places him in violation of Section III.3.a." ;
proeth:temporalscope "At the time of making each design modification to Engineer A's sealed plan sheets" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer B's failure to state with specificity what those changes in fact were made such a notation on the title sheet virtually meaningless",
"It is clear that Engineer B had an ethical obligation to make all necessary notations of changes which he had made with respect to the grading plans, housing pads, routing of streets, storm drains, pipe dimensions, sewers, and utilities. His failure to do so constituted a form of deception which places him in violation of Section III.3.a." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 173 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T14:41:54.509612"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 173 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
173
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T14:31:07.586453+00:00
First case
173
Generated
2026-03-01T14:31:07.586453+00:00
Attributed to
Case 173 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T14:41:54.509612
Generated by
ProEthica Case 173 Extraction