Engineer B Post-Discharge Collegial Consultation Prudential Obligation Case 82-5
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/173#Engineer_B_Post-Discharge_Collegial_Consultation_Prudential_Obligation_Case_82-5
Properties
Instance of
Post-DischargeCollegialConsultationPrudentialObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Post-DischargeCollegialConsultationPrudentialObligation
Case context
Engineer B made major changes to grading plans, housing pad elevations, street routing, storm drains, pipe dimensions, sewers, and utilities across a 43-sheet plan set without any communication with Engineer A.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.87
Importance
medium
Obligated party
Engineer B (Successor Design Engineer)
Obligation statement
Engineer B was prudentially obligated — though not strictly required — to consult with Engineer A before undertaking modifications to Engineer A's sealed plans, so that Engineer B could benefit from Engineer A's technical understanding of the design decisions and so that Engineer A's professional interest in the integrity of their sealed work was respected.
Temporal scope
Before commencing substantive modifications to Engineer A's sealed plan set
Source Evidence
Source text
we think it would have been wiser and more professional for Engineer B to consult with Engineer A before undertaking to modify the plans prepared by Engineer A
Text references
the purpose of Section 12(a) (now Section III.8.a.) is to provide the engineer whose work is being reviewed by another engineer an opportunity to submit ... comments or explanations for... technical decision, thereby enabling the reviewing engineer to have the benefit of a fuller understanding of the technical considerations in the original design
we think it would have been wiser and more professional for Engineer B to consult with Engineer A before undertaking to modify the plans prepared by Engineer A
TTL
@prefix case173: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/173#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case173:Engineer_B_Post-Discharge_Collegial_Consultation_Prudential_Obligation_Case_82-5 a proeth:Post-DischargeCollegialConsultationPrudentialObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Post-Discharge Collegial Consultation Prudential Obligation Case 82-5" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case173:Engineer_B_Discharged_Engineer_Review_Without_Notification_Permissibility_Case_82-5 ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case173:Absence_of_Communication_Between_Engineer_A_and_Engineer_B_During_Redesign,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/173#Inter-Engineer_Communication_Absent_—_Engineer_B_Modifying_Engineer_As_Plans> ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer B made major changes to grading plans, housing pad elevations, street routing, storm drains, pipe dimensions, sewers, and utilities across a 43-sheet plan set without any communication with Engineer A." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.87" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case173:Post-Discharge_Collegial_Consultation_Prudential_Norm_Applied_to_Engineer_B ;
proeth:discoveredincase "173" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T14:31:07.586453+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "173" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T14:31:07.586453+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer B (Successor Design Engineer)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Post-Discharge Collegial Consultation Prudential Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer B was prudentially obligated — though not strictly required — to consult with Engineer A before undertaking modifications to Engineer A's sealed plans, so that Engineer B could benefit from Engineer A's technical understanding of the design decisions and so that Engineer A's professional interest in the integrity of their sealed work was respected." ;
proeth:sourcetext "we think it would have been wiser and more professional for Engineer B to consult with Engineer A before undertaking to modify the plans prepared by Engineer A" ;
proeth:temporalscope "Before commencing substantive modifications to Engineer A's sealed plan set" ;
proeth:textreferences "the purpose of Section 12(a) (now Section III.8.a.) is to provide the engineer whose work is being reviewed by another engineer an opportunity to submit ... comments or explanations for... technical decision, thereby enabling the reviewing engineer to have the benefit of a fuller understanding of the technical considerations in the original design",
"we think it would have been wiser and more professional for Engineer B to consult with Engineer A before undertaking to modify the plans prepared by Engineer A" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 173 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T14:41:54.509373"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 173 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
173
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T14:31:07.586453+00:00
First case
173
Generated
2026-03-01T14:31:07.586453+00:00
Attributed to
Case 173 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T14:41:54.509373
Generated by
ProEthica Case 173 Extraction