Engineer B Covert Review Instruction
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15#Engineer_B_Covert_Review_Instruction
Definition
Owner's initial instruction to Engineer B to review Engineer A's work without Engineer A's knowledge
Properties
Instance of
Active period
From Owner's initial instruction to Engineer B through Owner's reluctant agreement to notify Engineer A
Affected parties
Engineer A
Engineer B
Owner
Confidence
0.92
Principle Transformation
Transforms general professional courtesy and fairness principles into a concrete notification obligation before accepting or conducting a peer review engagement.
Subject
Owner's initial instruction to Engineer B to review Engineer A's work without Engineer A's knowledge
Terminated by
Owner's reluctant consent to advise Engineer A of the planned peer review
Triggering event
Owner instructs Engineer B to conduct a peer review without disclosing it to Engineer A
Urgency level
high
Match Confidence
0.0
Matches Existing
false
Synthesis Literal
activePeriod
confidence
stateClass
subject
terminatedBy
textReferences
triggeringEvent
urgencyLevel
Relationships
activatedByEvent
Peer Review Blocked
activatesConstraint
Engineer A Peer Review Cooperation Constraint, Engineer B Covert Review Prohibition
activatesObligation
Engineer A Competence Review Disclosure, Engineer B Covert Review Refusal, Owner Peer Review Notification Consent
affects
Agent Engineer A, Agent Engineer B, Agent Owner
Source Evidence
Text references
Engineer B was completely correct in declining an assignment to conduct a peer review of Engineer A's work subject to an instruction not to disclose the peer review to Engineer A
Owner reluctantly agreed to advise Engineer A of the planned peer review
Source text
Engineer B was completely correct in declining an assignment to conduct a peer review of Engineer A's work subject to an instruction not to disclose the peer review to Engineer A
TTL
@prefix case15: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case15:Engineer_B_Covert_Review_Instruction a proeth:CovertReviewRequestState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Covert Review Instruction" ;
proeth-core:activatedByEvent case15:Peer_Review_Blocked ;
proeth-core:activatesConstraint case15:Engineer_A_Peer_Review_Cooperation_Constraint,
case15:Engineer_B_Covert_Review_Prohibition ;
proeth-core:activatesObligation case15:Engineer_A_Competence_Review_Disclosure,
case15:Engineer_B_Covert_Review_Refusal,
case15:Owner_Peer_Review_Notification_Consent ;
proeth-core:affects case15:Agent_Engineer_A,
case15:Agent_Engineer_B,
case15:Agent_Owner ;
proeth:activePeriod "From Owner's initial instruction to Engineer B through Owner's reluctant agreement to notify Engineer A" ;
proeth:affectedParties "Engineer A",
"Engineer B",
"Owner" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:principleTransformation "Transforms general professional courtesy and fairness principles into a concrete notification obligation before accepting or conducting a peer review engagement." ;
proeth:stateClass "Covert Review Request State" ;
proeth:subject "Owner's initial instruction to Engineer B to review Engineer A's work without Engineer A's knowledge" ;
proeth:terminatedBy "Owner's reluctant consent to advise Engineer A of the planned peer review" ;
proeth:textReferences "Engineer B was completely correct in declining an assignment to conduct a peer review of Engineer A's work subject to an instruction not to disclose the peer review to Engineer A",
"Owner reluctantly agreed to advise Engineer A of the planned peer review" ;
proeth:triggeringEvent "Owner instructs Engineer B to conduct a peer review without disclosing it to Engineer A" ;
proeth:urgencyLevel "high" ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 15 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 1 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "discussion" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-02T19:53:12.877625+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 15 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.0 ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting false ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "Engineer B was completely correct in declining an assignment to conduct a peer review of Engineer A's work subject to an instruction not to disclose the peer review to Engineer A" ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "activePeriod",
"confidence",
"stateClass",
"subject",
"terminatedBy",
"textReferences",
"triggeringEvent",
"urgencyLevel" ;
rdfs:comment "Owner's initial instruction to Engineer B to review Engineer A's work without Engineer A's knowledge" ;
skos:definition "Owner's initial instruction to Engineer B to review Engineer A's work without Engineer A's knowledge" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-02T19:53:12.877625+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 15 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 15 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
15
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-06-02T19:53:12.877625+00:00
First case
15
Generated
2026-06-02T19:53:12.877625+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 15 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 15 Extraction