Owner Peer Review Notification Consent
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15#Owner_Peer_Review_Notification_Consent
Definition
Owner was obligated, as a condition of proceeding with the peer review, to notify Engineer A of the planned review, and correctly agreed to do so after Engineer B declined to proceed without such notification.
Properties
Instance of
PeerReviewKnowledgeObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PeerReviewKnowledgeObligation
Case context
Owner initially instructed Engineer B to conduct the peer review without notifying Engineer A. After Engineer B declined, Owner reluctantly agreed to advise Engineer A of the planned peer review.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.88
Obligated party
Owner
Obligation statement
Owner was obligated, as a condition of proceeding with the peer review, to notify Engineer A of the planned review, and correctly agreed to do so after Engineer B declined to proceed without such notification.
Temporal scope
Prior to commencement of the peer review
Match Confidence
0.78
Match Reasoning
Via class 'Peer Review Knowledge Obligation': This obligation is a specific mandatory instantiation of the collegial duty toward professional peers, grounded in NSPE III.7.a. The prior extraction captured a related concept as Peer Review Notification Obligation, and this class generalizes that concept into a reusable canonical form tied directly to the code provision.
Matched Ontology Label
Collegial Obligation
Matches Existing
true
Synthesis Literal
caseContext
complianceStatus
confidence
obligationClass
obligationStatement
temporalScope
textReferences
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Owner Client Loyalty Limits Notification
Source Evidence
Text references
Engineers in private practice shall not review the work of another engineer for the same client, except with the knowledge of such engineer, or unless the connection of such engineer with the work has been terminated.
Owner reluctantly agreed to advise Engineer A of the planned peer review.
Source text
Owner reluctantly agreed to advise Engineer A of the planned peer review.
TTL
@prefix case15: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case15:Owner_Peer_Review_Notification_Consent a proeth:PeerReviewKnowledgeObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Owner Peer Review Notification Consent" ;
proeth:caseContext "Owner initially instructed Engineer B to conduct the peer review without notifying Engineer A. After Engineer B declined, Owner reluctantly agreed to advise Engineer A of the planned peer review." ;
proeth:complianceStatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case15:Owner_Client_Loyalty_Limits_Notification ;
proeth:obligatedParty "Owner" ;
proeth:obligationClass "Peer Review Knowledge Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationStatement "Owner was obligated, as a condition of proceeding with the peer review, to notify Engineer A of the planned review, and correctly agreed to do so after Engineer B declined to proceed without such notification." ;
proeth:temporalScope "Prior to commencement of the peer review" ;
proeth:textReferences "Engineers in private practice shall not review the work of another engineer for the same client, except with the knowledge of such engineer, or unless the connection of such engineer with the work has been terminated.",
"Owner reluctantly agreed to advise Engineer A of the planned peer review." ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 15 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "discussion" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-02T19:59:48.608792+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 15 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.78 ;
proeth-prov:matchReasoning "Via class 'Peer Review Knowledge Obligation': This obligation is a specific mandatory instantiation of the collegial duty toward professional peers, grounded in NSPE III.7.a. The prior extraction captured a related concept as Peer Review Notification Obligation, and this class generalizes that concept into a reusable canonical form tied directly to the code provision." ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyClass proeth:CollegialObligation ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyLabel "Collegial Obligation" ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting true ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "Owner reluctantly agreed to advise Engineer A of the planned peer review." ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext",
"complianceStatus",
"confidence",
"obligationClass",
"obligationStatement",
"temporalScope",
"textReferences" ;
rdfs:comment "Owner was obligated, as a condition of proceeding with the peer review, to notify Engineer A of the planned review, and correctly agreed to do so after Engineer B declined to proceed without such notification." ;
skos:definition "Owner was obligated, as a condition of proceeding with the peer review, to notify Engineer A of the planned review, and correctly agreed to do so after Engineer B declined to proceed without such notification." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-02T19:59:48.608792+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 15 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 15 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
15
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-06-02T19:59:48.608792+00:00
First case
15
Generated
2026-06-02T19:59:48.608792+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 15 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 15 Extraction