Engineer A Competence Review Disclosure
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15#Engineer_A_Competence_Review_Disclosure
Definition
Engineer A was obligated to acknowledge the limitations raised by the discovery of significant errors in the first tower plans and to support verification that the second tower plans met required competence standards, rather than obstructing review.
Properties
Instance of
Case context
Discovery of significant errors in the first tower plans raised questions about whether Engineer A's competence extended to the second tower design without independent verification.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.83
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to acknowledge the limitations raised by the discovery of significant errors in the first tower plans and to support verification that the second tower plans met required competence standards, rather than obstructing review.
Temporal scope
Following discovery of significant errors in the first tower plans
Match Confidence
0.95
Match Reasoning
Individual typed as existing ontology class 'Competence Obligation'
Matched Ontology Label
Competence Obligation
Matches Existing
true
Synthesis Literal
caseContext
complianceStatus
confidence
obligationClass
obligationStatement
temporalScope
textReferences
Relationships
obligatedParty
Agent Engineer A
derivedFromPrinciple
Engineer A Professional Competence Review
Source Evidence
Text references
Engineer A objects and refused to consent to the peer review.
Several significant design errors are discovered in the plans and design of Engineer A.
Source text
Several significant design errors are discovered in the plans and design of Engineer A.
TTL
@prefix case15: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/15#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case15:Engineer_A_Competence_Review_Disclosure a proeth:CompetenceObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Competence Review Disclosure" ;
proeth-core:obligatedParty case15:Agent_Engineer_A ;
proeth:caseContext "Discovery of significant errors in the first tower plans raised questions about whether Engineer A's competence extended to the second tower design without independent verification." ;
proeth:complianceStatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.83" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case15:Engineer_A_Professional_Competence_Review ;
proeth:obligatedParty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationClass "Competence Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationStatement "Engineer A was obligated to acknowledge the limitations raised by the discovery of significant errors in the first tower plans and to support verification that the second tower plans met required competence standards, rather than obstructing review." ;
proeth:temporalScope "Following discovery of significant errors in the first tower plans" ;
proeth:textReferences "Engineer A objects and refused to consent to the peer review.",
"Several significant design errors are discovered in the plans and design of Engineer A." ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 15 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "facts" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-02T19:56:24.847658+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 15 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.95 ;
proeth-prov:matchReasoning "Individual typed as existing ontology class 'Competence Obligation'" ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyClass proeth:CompetenceObligation ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyLabel "Competence Obligation" ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting true ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "Several significant design errors are discovered in the plans and design of Engineer A." ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext",
"complianceStatus",
"confidence",
"obligationClass",
"obligationStatement",
"temporalScope",
"textReferences" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer A was obligated to acknowledge the limitations raised by the discovery of significant errors in the first tower plans and to support verification that the second tower plans met required competence standards, rather than obstructing review." ;
skos:definition "Engineer A was obligated to acknowledge the limitations raised by the discovery of significant errors in the first tower plans and to support verification that the second tower plans met required competence standards, rather than obstructing review." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-02T19:56:24.847658+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 15 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 15 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
15
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-06-02T19:56:24.847658+00:00
First case
15
Generated
2026-06-02T19:56:24.847658+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 15 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 15 Extraction