Engineer A Complete Options Advisory
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#Engineer_A_Complete_Options_Advisory
Definition
Engineer A was obligated to present all four funding-agency-approved project delivery methods to City B in the advisory memo, rather than limiting the analysis to Design-Bid-Build and Progressive-Design-Build.
Properties
Instance of
CompleteOptionsAdvisoryObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CompleteOptionsAdvisoryObligation
Case context
Engineer A prepared a summary memo for City B Administrator advising on project delivery methods for a wastewater system improvements project funded by a specific funding source that approved four delivery methods. Engineer A omitted Construction-Manager-at-Risk and Fixed-Price-Design-Build from the memo.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.93
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to present all four funding-agency-approved project delivery methods to City B in the advisory memo, rather than limiting the analysis to Design-Bid-Build and Progressive-Design-Build.
Temporal scope
At the time of preparing and submitting the advisory memo to City B Administrator
Match Confidence
0.0
Matches Existing
false
Synthesis Literal
caseContext
complianceStatus
confidence
obligationClass
obligationStatement
temporalScope
textReferences
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Engineer A Selective Option Disclosure
obligatedParty
Agent Engineer A
derivedFromPrinciple
Engineer A Complete Options Analysis
Source Evidence
Text references
Engineer A prepared a summary memo to City B Administrator and only identified Design-Bid-Build and Progressive-Design-Build as viable project delivery options.
Under the proposed funding source, there are four approved project delivery methods: Design-Bid-Build, Construction-Management-at-Risk, Fixed-Price-Design-Build, and Progressive-Design-Build.
Source text
Under the proposed funding source, there are four approved project delivery methods: Design-Bid-Build, Construction-Management-at-Risk, Fixed-Price-Design-Build, and Progressive-Design-Build.
TTL
@prefix case14: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case14:Engineer_A_Complete_Options_Advisory a proeth:CompleteOptionsAdvisoryObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Complete Options Advisory" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case14:Engineer_A_Selective_Option_Disclosure ;
proeth-core:obligatedParty case14:Agent_Engineer_A ;
proeth:caseContext "Engineer A prepared a summary memo for City B Administrator advising on project delivery methods for a wastewater system improvements project funded by a specific funding source that approved four delivery methods. Engineer A omitted Construction-Manager-at-Risk and Fixed-Price-Design-Build from the memo." ;
proeth:complianceStatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.93" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case14:Engineer_A_Complete_Options_Analysis ;
proeth:obligatedParty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationClass "Complete Options Advisory Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationStatement "Engineer A was obligated to present all four funding-agency-approved project delivery methods to City B in the advisory memo, rather than limiting the analysis to Design-Bid-Build and Progressive-Design-Build." ;
proeth:temporalScope "At the time of preparing and submitting the advisory memo to City B Administrator" ;
proeth:textReferences "Engineer A prepared a summary memo to City B Administrator and only identified Design-Bid-Build and Progressive-Design-Build as viable project delivery options.",
"Under the proposed funding source, there are four approved project delivery methods: Design-Bid-Build, Construction-Management-at-Risk, Fixed-Price-Design-Build, and Progressive-Design-Build." ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 14 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "facts" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-04T08:44:38.157284+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 14 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.0 ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting false ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "Under the proposed funding source, there are four approved project delivery methods: Design-Bid-Build, Construction-Management-at-Risk, Fixed-Price-Design-Build, and Progressive-Design-Build." ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext",
"complianceStatus",
"confidence",
"obligationClass",
"obligationStatement",
"temporalScope",
"textReferences" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer A was obligated to present all four funding-agency-approved project delivery methods to City B in the advisory memo, rather than limiting the analysis to Design-Bid-Build and Progressive-Design-Build." ;
skos:definition "Engineer A was obligated to present all four funding-agency-approved project delivery methods to City B in the advisory memo, rather than limiting the analysis to Design-Bid-Build and Progressive-Design-Build." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-04T08:44:38.157284+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 14 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 14 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
14
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-06-04T08:44:38.157284+00:00
First case
14
Generated
2026-06-04T08:44:38.157284+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 14 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 14 Extraction