City B Regulatory Funding Constraints
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#City_B_Regulatory_Funding_Constraints
Definition
City B's obligation to select a project delivery method from the four approved under the specific funding source
Properties
Instance of
Active period
Throughout the project planning and delivery method selection process
Affected parties
City B
Engineer A
Funding Agency
Confidence
0.9
Principle Transformation
Transforms the general duty of honesty and objectivity into a concrete obligation to present all materially relevant options and disclose the basis for any exclusions.
Subject
City B's obligation to select a project delivery method from the four approved under the specific funding source
Terminated by
Project delivery method selected and funding agency requirements satisfied
Triggering event
City B's use of a specific funding source that restricts approved project delivery methods and imposes additional requirements such as separation of Construction Manager at Risk and Engineer of Record
Urgency level
medium
Match Confidence
0.95
Match Reasoning
Individual typed as existing ontology class 'Regulatory Compliance State'
Matched Ontology Label
Regulatory Compliance State
Matches Existing
true
Synthesis Literal
activePeriod
confidence
stateClass
subject
terminatedBy
textReferences
triggeringEvent
urgencyLevel
Relationships
activatedByEvent
Funding Approval Established
activatesConstraint
Engineer A CM-at-Risk Exclusion Disclosure, Engineer A Self-Promotion Advisory
activatesObligation
Engineer A Advisory Conflict Disclosure, Engineer A Fiduciary Advisory Duty
affects
Agent City B, Agent Engineer A
terminatedByEvent
Delivery Options Narrowed
Source Evidence
Text references
Under the proposed funding source, there are four approved project delivery methods
if Construction Manager at Risk is selected by the owner, City B, the funding agency requires the Construction Manager at Risk firm and the Engineer of Record be two distinct entities
Source text
Under the proposed funding source, there are four approved project delivery methods
TTL
@prefix case14: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case14:City_B_Regulatory_Funding_Constraints a proeth:RegulatoryComplianceState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "City B Regulatory Funding Constraints" ;
proeth-core:activatedByEvent case14:Funding_Approval_Established ;
proeth-core:activatesConstraint case14:Engineer_A_CM-at-Risk_Exclusion_Disclosure,
case14:Engineer_A_Self-Promotion_Advisory ;
proeth-core:activatesObligation case14:Engineer_A_Advisory_Conflict_Disclosure,
case14:Engineer_A_Fiduciary_Advisory_Duty ;
proeth-core:affects case14:Agent_City_B,
case14:Agent_Engineer_A ;
proeth-core:terminatedByEvent case14:Delivery_Options_Narrowed ;
proeth:activePeriod "Throughout the project planning and delivery method selection process" ;
proeth:affectedParties "City B",
"Engineer A",
"Funding Agency" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:principleTransformation "Transforms the general duty of honesty and objectivity into a concrete obligation to present all materially relevant options and disclose the basis for any exclusions." ;
proeth:stateClass "Regulatory Compliance State" ;
proeth:subject "City B's obligation to select a project delivery method from the four approved under the specific funding source" ;
proeth:terminatedBy "Project delivery method selected and funding agency requirements satisfied" ;
proeth:textReferences "Under the proposed funding source, there are four approved project delivery methods",
"if Construction Manager at Risk is selected by the owner, City B, the funding agency requires the Construction Manager at Risk firm and the Engineer of Record be two distinct entities" ;
proeth:triggeringEvent "City B's use of a specific funding source that restricts approved project delivery methods and imposes additional requirements such as separation of Construction Manager at Risk and Engineer of Record" ;
proeth:urgencyLevel "medium" ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 14 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 1 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "facts" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-04T08:41:16.710298+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 14 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.95 ;
proeth-prov:matchReasoning "Individual typed as existing ontology class 'Regulatory Compliance State'" ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyClass proeth:RegulatoryCompliance ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyLabel "Regulatory Compliance State" ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting true ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "Under the proposed funding source, there are four approved project delivery methods" ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "activePeriod",
"confidence",
"stateClass",
"subject",
"terminatedBy",
"textReferences",
"triggeringEvent",
"urgencyLevel" ;
rdfs:comment "City B's obligation to select a project delivery method from the four approved under the specific funding source" ;
skos:definition "City B's obligation to select a project delivery method from the four approved under the specific funding source" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-04T08:41:16.710298+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 14 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 14 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
14
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-06-04T08:41:16.710298+00:00
First case
14
Generated
2026-06-04T08:41:16.710298+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 14 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 14 Extraction