Engineer A CM-at-Risk Exclusion Disclosure
Cs · Constraint
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#Engineer_A_CM-at-Risk_Exclusion_Disclosure
Definition
Engineer A was required to disclose to City B Administrator the funding agency's requirement that under Construction-Manager-at-Risk, the CM firm and the Engineer of Record must be two distinct entities, rather than omitting that method from the advisory memo entirely, so that City B could evaluate the method with full knowledge of its regulatory conditions.
Properties
Instance of
Case context
The funding agency imposed a specific structural requirement on Construction-Manager-at-Risk: the CM firm and Engineer of Record must be distinct entities. Engineer A omitted this method from the memo entirely rather than presenting it with its regulatory conditions, depriving City B of the ability to evaluate it.
Confidence
0.83
Constraint statement
Engineer A was required to disclose to City B Administrator the funding agency's requirement that under Construction-Manager-at-Risk, the CM firm and the Engineer of Record must be two distinct entities, rather than omitting that method from the advisory memo entirely, so that City B could evaluate the method with full knowledge of its regulatory conditions.
Severity
medium
Source
Funding agency regulatory requirements governing Construction-Manager-at-Risk under the specific funding source
Temporal scope
At the time Engineer A prepared the advisory memo for City B Administrator
Match Confidence
0.0
Matches Existing
false
Synthesis Literal
caseContext
confidence
constraintClass
constraintStatement
severity
source
temporalScope
textReferences
Relationships
constrainedEntity
Agent Engineer A
Source Evidence
Text references
Engineer A prepared a summary memo to City B Administrator and only identified Design-Bid-Build and Progressive-Design-Build as viable project delivery options.
if Construction Manager at Risk is selected by the owner, City B, the funding agency requires the Construction Manager at Risk firm and the Engineer of Record be two distinct entities.
Source text
if Construction Manager at Risk is selected by the owner, City B, the funding agency requires the Construction Manager at Risk firm and the Engineer of Record be two distinct entities.
TTL
@prefix case14: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case14:Engineer_A_CM-at-Risk_Exclusion_Disclosure a proeth:RegulatoryOptionConstraint,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A CM-at-Risk Exclusion Disclosure" ;
proeth-core:constrainedEntity case14:Agent_Engineer_A ;
proeth:caseContext "The funding agency imposed a specific structural requirement on Construction-Manager-at-Risk: the CM firm and Engineer of Record must be distinct entities. Engineer A omitted this method from the memo entirely rather than presenting it with its regulatory conditions, depriving City B of the ability to evaluate it." ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Constraint" ;
proeth:confidence "0.83" ;
proeth:constrainedEntity "Engineer A" ;
proeth:constraintClass "Regulatory Option Constraint" ;
proeth:constraintStatement "Engineer A was required to disclose to City B Administrator the funding agency's requirement that under Construction-Manager-at-Risk, the CM firm and the Engineer of Record must be two distinct entities, rather than omitting that method from the advisory memo entirely, so that City B could evaluate the method with full knowledge of its regulatory conditions." ;
proeth:severity "medium" ;
proeth:source "Funding agency regulatory requirements governing Construction-Manager-at-Risk under the specific funding source" ;
proeth:temporalScope "At the time Engineer A prepared the advisory memo for City B Administrator" ;
proeth:textReferences "Engineer A prepared a summary memo to City B Administrator and only identified Design-Bid-Build and Progressive-Design-Build as viable project delivery options.",
"if Construction Manager at Risk is selected by the owner, City B, the funding agency requires the Construction Manager at Risk firm and the Engineer of Record be two distinct entities." ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 14 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "facts" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-04T08:45:47.831992+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 14 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.0 ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting false ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "if Construction Manager at Risk is selected by the owner, City B, the funding agency requires the Construction Manager at Risk firm and the Engineer of Record be two distinct entities." ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext",
"confidence",
"constraintClass",
"constraintStatement",
"severity",
"source",
"temporalScope",
"textReferences" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer A was required to disclose to City B Administrator the funding agency's requirement that under Construction-Manager-at-Risk, the CM firm and the Engineer of Record must be two distinct entities, rather than omitting that method from the advisory memo entirely, so that City B could evaluate the method with full knowledge of its regulatory conditions." ;
skos:definition "Engineer A was required to disclose to City B Administrator the funding agency's requirement that under Construction-Manager-at-Risk, the CM firm and the Engineer of Record must be two distinct entities, rather than omitting that method from the advisory memo entirely, so that City B could evaluate the method with full knowledge of its regulatory conditions." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-04T08:45:47.831992+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 14 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 14 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
14
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-06-04T08:45:47.831992+00:00
First case
14
Generated
2026-06-04T08:45:47.831992+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 14 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 14 Extraction