Engineer A Advisory Conflict Disclosure
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#Engineer_A_Advisory_Conflict_Disclosure
Definition
Engineer A was obligated to disclose to City B Administrator that Engineer A is qualified to provide construction services under Progressive-Design-Build, and therefore has a financial interest in the outcome of the recommendation, before or concurrent with issuing the advisory memo recommending Progressive-Design-Build.
Properties
Instance of
AdvisoryConflictDisclosureObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#AdvisoryConflictDisclosureObligation
Case context
Engineer A, who provides construction services in City B and is qualified to deliver services under Progressive-Design-Build, recommended Progressive-Design-Build to City B without disclosing that financial interest. Engineer A also included promotional materials about the firm's experience with Progressive-Design-Build in the same memo.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.94
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to disclose to City B Administrator that Engineer A is qualified to provide construction services under Progressive-Design-Build, and therefore has a financial interest in the outcome of the recommendation, before or concurrent with issuing the advisory memo recommending Progressive-Design-Build.
Temporal scope
At the time of preparing and submitting the advisory memo recommending Progressive-Design-Build
Match Confidence
0.75
Match Reasoning
Via class 'Advisory Conflict Disclosure Obligation': This is a specialization of the existing Disclosure Obligation, focused specifically on conflict-of-interest disclosure in an advisory role where the engineer stands to benefit from the recommended option. The existing Disclosure Obligation is the closest match but does not encode the advisory-role and self-interest-in-recommendation specifics. Medium confidence match to parent.
Matched Ontology Label
Disclosure Obligation
Matches Existing
true
Synthesis Literal
caseContext
complianceStatus
confidence
obligationClass
obligationStatement
temporalScope
textReferences
Relationships
obligatedParty
Agent Engineer A
derivedFromPrinciple
Engineer A Conflict of Interest Disclosure
Source Evidence
Text references
Engineer A is qualified to provide construction services under Progressive-Design-Build and Construction-Manager-at-Risk delivery methods.
Engineer A recommended Progressive Design Build. Accompanying the recommendation, Engineer A provided a summary of the firm's experience with Progressive-Design-Build projects and references from past projects.
Source text
Engineer A is qualified to provide construction services under Progressive-Design-Build and Construction-Manager-at-Risk delivery methods.
TTL
@prefix case14: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/14#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix proeth-prov: <http://proethica.org/provenance#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case14:Engineer_A_Advisory_Conflict_Disclosure a proeth:AdvisoryConflictDisclosureObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Advisory Conflict Disclosure" ;
proeth-core:obligatedParty case14:Agent_Engineer_A ;
proeth:caseContext "Engineer A, who provides construction services in City B and is qualified to deliver services under Progressive-Design-Build, recommended Progressive-Design-Build to City B without disclosing that financial interest. Engineer A also included promotional materials about the firm's experience with Progressive-Design-Build in the same memo." ;
proeth:complianceStatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.94" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case14:Engineer_A_Conflict_of_Interest_Disclosure ;
proeth:obligatedParty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationClass "Advisory Conflict Disclosure Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationStatement "Engineer A was obligated to disclose to City B Administrator that Engineer A is qualified to provide construction services under Progressive-Design-Build, and therefore has a financial interest in the outcome of the recommendation, before or concurrent with issuing the advisory memo recommending Progressive-Design-Build." ;
proeth:temporalScope "At the time of preparing and submitting the advisory memo recommending Progressive-Design-Build" ;
proeth:textReferences "Engineer A is qualified to provide construction services under Progressive-Design-Build and Construction-Manager-at-Risk delivery methods.",
"Engineer A recommended Progressive Design Build. Accompanying the recommendation, Engineer A provided a summary of the firm's experience with Progressive-Design-Build projects and references from past projects." ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 14 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ;
proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "facts" ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-04T08:44:38.157284+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 14 ;
proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.75 ;
proeth-prov:matchReasoning "Via class 'Advisory Conflict Disclosure Obligation': This is a specialization of the existing Disclosure Obligation, focused specifically on conflict-of-interest disclosure in an advisory role where the engineer stands to benefit from the recommended option. The existing Disclosure Obligation is the closest match but does not encode the advisory-role and self-interest-in-recommendation specifics. Medium confidence match to parent." ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyClass proeth:DisclosureObligation ;
proeth-prov:matchedOntologyLabel "Disclosure Obligation" ;
proeth-prov:matchesExisting true ;
proeth-prov:sourceText "Engineer A is qualified to provide construction services under Progressive-Design-Build and Construction-Manager-at-Risk delivery methods." ;
proeth-prov:synthesisLiteral "caseContext",
"complianceStatus",
"confidence",
"obligationClass",
"obligationStatement",
"temporalScope",
"textReferences" ;
rdfs:comment "Engineer A was obligated to disclose to City B Administrator that Engineer A is qualified to provide construction services under Progressive-Design-Build, and therefore has a financial interest in the outcome of the recommendation, before or concurrent with issuing the advisory memo recommending Progressive-Design-Build." ;
skos:definition "Engineer A was obligated to disclose to City B Administrator that Engineer A is qualified to provide construction services under Progressive-Design-Build, and therefore has a financial interest in the outcome of the recommendation, before or concurrent with issuing the advisory memo recommending Progressive-Design-Build." ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-04T08:44:38.157284+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 14 Extraction",
"claude-sonnet-4-6" ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 14 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
14
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-06-04T08:44:38.157284+00:00
First case
14
Generated
2026-06-04T08:44:38.157284+00:00
Attributed to
['Case 14 Extraction', 'claude-sonnet-4-6']
Generated by
ProEthica Case 14 Extraction