Engineer A No-Nexus Direct Notification Owner Y Conditional
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/139#Engineer_A_No-Nexus_Direct_Notification_Owner_Y_Conditional
Properties
Instance of
No-Contractual-NexusThird-PartyDirectSafetyNotificationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#No-Contractual-NexusThird-PartyDirectSafetyNotificationObligation
Case context
Owner Y has no contractual or professional relationship with Engineer A, ES Consulting, or Client X; direct notification to Owner Y becomes obligatory if the employer-intermediary escalation pathway fails to produce adequate corrective action.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.85
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A is conditionally obligated to notify Owner Y directly of the observed safety issues if ES Consulting and Client X fail to take adequate corrective action after being informed, notwithstanding the complete absence of any prior relationship with Owner Y.
Temporal scope
Conditional on ES Consulting and/or Client X failing to take adequate corrective action after being informed of the observed safety issues
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Engineer A – No Relationship with Owner Y Obligation Boundary
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A observes potential safety issues relating to the performance of work by a subcontractor on a project being constructed on an adjacent piece of property for Owner Y, a party with whom neither Engineer A, ES Consulting, or Client X has any direct relationship.
Text references
Engineer A observes potential safety issues relating to the performance of work by a subcontractor on a project being constructed on an adjacent piece of property for Owner Y, a party with whom neither Engineer A, ES Consulting, or Client X has any direct relationship.
TTL
@prefix case139: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/139#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case139:Engineer_A_No-Nexus_Direct_Notification_Owner_Y_Conditional a proeth:No-Contractual-NexusThird-PartyDirectSafetyNotificationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A No-Nexus Direct Notification Owner Y Conditional" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case139:Engineer_A_Employer_Intermediary_Escalation_ES_Consulting_Owner_Y_Safety ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/139#Engineer_A_–_No_Relationship_with_Owner_Y_Obligation_Boundary> ;
proeth:casecontext "Owner Y has no contractual or professional relationship with Engineer A, ES Consulting, or Client X; direct notification to Owner Y becomes obligatory if the employer-intermediary escalation pathway fails to produce adequate corrective action." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.85" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case139:Non-Contractual_Third-Party_Safety_Observation_Duty_Invoked_by_Engineer_A,
case139:Third-Party_Affected_Party_Direct_Notification_Obligation_Invoked_Regarding_Owner_Y ;
proeth:discoveredincase "139" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T10:43:40.857216+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "139" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T10:43:40.857216+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "No-Contractual-Nexus Third-Party Direct Safety Notification Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A is conditionally obligated to notify Owner Y directly of the observed safety issues if ES Consulting and Client X fail to take adequate corrective action after being informed, notwithstanding the complete absence of any prior relationship with Owner Y." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A observes potential safety issues relating to the performance of work by a subcontractor on a project being constructed on an adjacent piece of property for Owner Y, a party with whom neither Engineer A, ES Consulting, or Client X has any direct relationship." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Conditional on ES Consulting and/or Client X failing to take adequate corrective action after being informed of the observed safety issues" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A observes potential safety issues relating to the performance of work by a subcontractor on a project being constructed on an adjacent piece of property for Owner Y, a party with whom neither Engineer A, ES Consulting, or Client X has any direct relationship." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 139 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T11:01:04.759716"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 139 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
139
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-28T10:43:40.857216+00:00
First case
139
Generated
2026-02-28T10:43:40.857216+00:00
Attributed to
Case 139 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T11:01:04.759716
Generated by
ProEthica Case 139 Extraction