Engineer A Employer Intermediary Escalation ES Consulting Owner Y Safety
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/139#Engineer_A_Employer_Intermediary_Escalation_ES_Consulting_Owner_Y_Safety
Properties
Instance of
EmployerIntermediarySafetyEscalationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EmployerIntermediarySafetyEscalationObligation
Case context
Engineer A is employed by ES Consulting and performs services through that firm; ES Consulting is the appropriate organizational intermediary for coordinating the response to out-of-scope safety observations on adjacent third-party property.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.87
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A is obligated to escalate the observed safety concerns on Owner Y's adjacent property to ES Consulting as the employer and prime consultant, as the first and appropriate organizational escalation step, before or in lieu of direct unilateral action toward Owner Y.
Temporal scope
Promptly upon observation of the potential safety issues, before taking any unilateral direct action toward Owner Y
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Engineer A – No Relationship with Owner Y Obligation Boundary
derivedFromPrinciple
Incidental Observation Disclosure Obligation Invoked by Engineer A
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A works for ES Consulting, a consulting engineering firm.
Text references
Engineer A observes potential safety issues relating to the performance of work by a subcontractor on a project being constructed on an adjacent piece of property for Owner Y, a party with whom neither Engineer A, ES Consulting, or Client X has any direct relationship.
Engineer A works for ES Consulting, a consulting engineering firm.
In performing engineering services for ES Consulting, Engineer A performs construction observation services on a project for Client X.
TTL
@prefix case139: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/139#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case139:Engineer_A_Employer_Intermediary_Escalation_ES_Consulting_Owner_Y_Safety a proeth:EmployerIntermediarySafetyEscalationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Employer Intermediary Escalation ES Consulting Owner Y Safety" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case139:Engineer_A_No-Nexus_Direct_Notification_Owner_Y_Conditional ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/139#Engineer_A_–_No_Relationship_with_Owner_Y_Obligation_Boundary> ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case139:Engineer_A_Permissible_Employer_Escalation_Adjacent_Safety_Observation ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A is employed by ES Consulting and performs services through that firm; ES Consulting is the appropriate organizational intermediary for coordinating the response to out-of-scope safety observations on adjacent third-party property." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.87" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case139:Incidental_Observation_Disclosure_Obligation_Invoked_by_Engineer_A ;
proeth:discoveredincase "139" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T10:43:40.857216+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "139" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T10:43:40.857216+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Employer Intermediary Safety Escalation Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A is obligated to escalate the observed safety concerns on Owner Y's adjacent property to ES Consulting as the employer and prime consultant, as the first and appropriate organizational escalation step, before or in lieu of direct unilateral action toward Owner Y." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A works for ES Consulting, a consulting engineering firm." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Promptly upon observation of the potential safety issues, before taking any unilateral direct action toward Owner Y" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A observes potential safety issues relating to the performance of work by a subcontractor on a project being constructed on an adjacent piece of property for Owner Y, a party with whom neither Engineer A, ES Consulting, or Client X has any direct relationship.",
"Engineer A works for ES Consulting, a consulting engineering firm.",
"In performing engineering services for ES Consulting, Engineer A performs construction observation services on a project for Client X." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 139 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T11:01:04.759453"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 139 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
139
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-28T10:43:40.857216+00:00
First case
139
Generated
2026-02-28T10:43:40.857216+00:00
Attributed to
Case 139 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T11:01:04.759453
Generated by
ProEthica Case 139 Extraction