Engineer A – No Relationship with Owner Y Obligation Boundary
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/139#Engineer_A_–_No_Relationship_with_Owner_Y_Obligation_Boundary
Properties
Instance of
ProfessionalObligationBoundaryDeterminationState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ProfessionalObligationBoundaryDeterminationState
Active period
From the moment of observation through Engineer A's decision about whether and how to act
Affected parties
Client X
ES Consulting
Engineer A
Owner Y
Confidence
0.87
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer A's need to determine the scope and mechanism of any obligation toward Owner Y and the adjacent property, given the complete absence of any direct relationship
Terminated by
Engineer A determines and executes an appropriate course of action (notification, escalation, or documented determination of no actionable obligation)
Triggering event
Recognition that the safety concern involves a party with whom no direct relationship exists, requiring determination of whether paramount public safety obligations override the relational boundary
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
a party with whom neither Engineer A, ES Consulting, or Client X has any direct relationship
Text references
a party with whom neither Engineer A, ES Consulting, or Client X has any direct relationship
TTL
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/139#Engineer_A_–_No_Relationship_with_Owner_Y_Obligation_Boundary> a proeth:ProfessionalObligationBoundaryDeterminationState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A – No Relationship with Owner Y Obligation Boundary" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From the moment of observation through Engineer A's decision about whether and how to act" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Client X",
"ES Consulting",
"Engineer A",
"Owner Y" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.87" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "139" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T10:38:26.557632+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "139" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T10:38:26.557632+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "a party with whom neither Engineer A, ES Consulting, or Client X has any direct relationship" ;
proeth:stateclass "Professional Obligation Boundary Determination State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A's need to determine the scope and mechanism of any obligation toward Owner Y and the adjacent property, given the complete absence of any direct relationship" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Engineer A determines and executes an appropriate course of action (notification, escalation, or documented determination of no actionable obligation)" ;
proeth:textreferences "a party with whom neither Engineer A, ES Consulting, or Client X has any direct relationship" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Recognition that the safety concern involves a party with whom no direct relationship exists, requiring determination of whether paramount public safety obligations override the relational boundary" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 139 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T11:01:04.753876"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 139 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
139
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-28T10:38:26.557632+00:00
First case
139
Generated
2026-02-28T10:38:26.557632+00:00
Attributed to
Case 139 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T11:01:04.753876
Generated by
ProEthica Case 139 Extraction