Undisclosed Available Resource State
Class
5b9d7103
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#UndisclosedAvailableResourceState
Definition
State in which a public agency possesses existing technical documents (such as as-built drawings) that are materially relevant to bidders' or contractors' ability to accurately scope and price work, but those documents are not referenced or made available in bid solicitation materials — creating an information asymmetry between the agency and prospective contractors, and raising ethical questions about whether the omission is equitable, whether selective post-award disclosure advantages some contractors over others, and whether pre-bid disclosure should be standard practice.
Properties
Subclass of
Definition
State in which a public agency possesses existing technical documents (such as as-built drawings) that are materially relevant to bidders' or contractors' ability to accurately scope and price work, but those documents are not referenced or made available in bid solicitation materials — creating an information asymmetry between the agency and prospective contractors, and raising ethical questions about whether the omission is equitable, whether selective post-award disclosure advantages some contractors over others, and whether pre-bid disclosure should be standard practice.
Source Evidence
Source Text
the bid documents made no reference to existing as-builts or drawings for the bidders' or awarded contractor's use
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_intermediate_extended: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate-extended> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#UndisclosedAvailableResourceState> a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "Undisclosed Available Resource State" ;
rdfs:comment "State in which a public agency possesses existing technical documents (such as as-built drawings) that are materially relevant to bidders' or contractors' ability to accurately scope and price work, but those documents are not referenced or made available in bid solicitation materials — creating an information asymmetry between the agency and prospective contractors, and raising ethical questions about whether the omission is equitable, whether selective post-award disclosure advantages some contractors over others, and whether pre-bid disclosure should be standard practice." ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#State> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Class
Content Hash
5b9d71035b412f31...Last Updated
2026-03-12 16:49
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
22
Discovered In Pass
1
Discovered In Section
facts
First Discovered At
2026-02-25T16:51:37.016739+00:00
First Discovered In Case
22
Generated
2026-02-25T16:51:37.016739+00:00
Was Attributed To
Case 22 Extraction