ABC Engineering Design-Build Joint Venture Participant

@prefix case96: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case96:ABC_Engineering_Design-Build_Joint_Venture_Participant a proeth:Design-BuildJointVentureEngineer, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "ABC Engineering Design-Build Joint Venture Participant" ; proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple case96:Agency_Disclosure_and_Approval_Obligation_Invoked_by_ABC_Engineering_Pre-Participation_Decision, case96:Conflict_of_Interest_Disclosure_Evolution_Principle_Invoked_by_ABC_Engineering_Post-Review_Participation_Assessment, case96:Dual_Role_Appearance_of_Impropriety_Avoidance_Invoked_by_ABC_Engineering_Sequential_Role_Transition, case96:Post-Review_Conflict_of_Interest_Avoidance_Invoked_by_ABC_Engineering_Design-Build_Participation_Decision ; proeth-core:hasObligation case96:ABC_Engineering_No-Confidentiality-Agreement_Conflict_Management_Non-Waiver, case96:ABC_Engineering_One-Year_Cooling-Off_Period_Sufficiency_Assessment, case96:ABC_Engineering_Peer_Review_Privileged_Access_Non-Exploitation_in_Design-Build_Procurement, case96:ABC_Engineering_Post-Review_Design-Build_Conflict_Disclosure_to_State_Agency, case96:ABC_Engineering_Post-Review_Design-Build_Participation_Agency_Approval_Prerequisite ; proeth:attributes "{'prior_role': 'External peer reviewer', 'current_role': 'Design-build joint venture participant with XYZ Construction', 'conflict_concern': 'Access to confidential nonpublic information from prior peer review'}" ; proeth:caseinvolvement "ABC Engineering, having previously conducted an independent external peer review, participates with XYZ Construction in a design-build joint venture, raising conflict-of-interest questions regarding access to confidential nonpublic information gained during the peer review and whether that access confers unfair competitive advantage in the design-build procurement." ; proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ; proeth:confidence "0.92" ; proeth:discoveredincase "96" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T21:44:28.363540+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "96" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T21:44:28.363540+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:relationships "{'type': 'joint_venture_with', 'target': 'XYZ Construction Design-Build Inviting Contractor'}", "{'type': 'prior_reviewer_for', 'target': 'State Transportation Agency Peer Review Client'}" ; proeth:rolecategory "provider_client" ; proeth:roleclass "Design-Build Joint Venture Engineer" ; proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A and ABC Engineering's participation with XYZ Construction in the design-build joint venture" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer A and ABC Engineering's participation with XYZ Construction in the design-build joint venture", "the BER does not believe Engineer A and ABC Engineering's participation with XYZ Construction in the design-build joint venture raises a conflict of interest", "the access to confidential, nonpublic information could provide Engineer A with some advantages" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 96 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T22:02:18.113842"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 96 Extraction" .