Engineer A Non-Volunteering Adverse Impacts Public Hearing Developer F
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#Engineer_A_Non-Volunteering_Adverse_Impacts_Public_Hearing_Developer_F
Properties
Instance of
Client-RetainedPublicHearingPresenterAdverseImpactNon-VolunteeringPermissibilityObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Client-RetainedPublicHearingPresenterAdverseImpactNon-VolunteeringPermissibilityObligation
Case context
Engineer A presents the waterfront development project to the City Planning Board, highlighting environmental benefits of converting industrial waterfront to parkland, but does not volunteer known adverse traffic, noise, and air pollution impacts because the Board did not specifically question Engineer A on these factors.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A, retained by Developer F, was not ethically required to volunteer known traffic, noise, and air pollution impacts to the City Planning Board when not directly questioned, provided the presentation did not affirmatively mislead the Board and Engineer A answered all direct questions completely and honestly.
Temporal scope
During the public hearing presentation before the City Planning Board
Relationships
competesWith
Engineer A Competing Public Goods Balanced Disclosure Assessment BER Present Case, Engineer A Faithful Agent Developer F Public Hearing Presentation, Engineer A NSPE Code Conformance Public Testimony Waterfront Development, Engineer A Non-Concealment Public Welfare Impact Waterfront Development Presentation
defeasibleUnder
Client vs. Public Interest Tension in Public Hearing Presentation, Engineer A Traffic Noise Air Pollution Disclosure Relevance Determination
derivedFromPrinciple
Relevance and Pertinence Standard Invoked by Engineer A at City X Public Hearing
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A is aware of these factors, but was not specifically questioned on these factors and does not volunteer this fact.
Text references
Engineer A is aware of these factors, but was not specifically questioned on these factors and does not volunteer this fact.
Had Engineer A been questioned by the City Planning Board, Engineer A would have provided testimony concerning these issues.
TTL
@prefix case94: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case94:Engineer_A_Non-Volunteering_Adverse_Impacts_Public_Hearing_Developer_F a proeth:Client-RetainedPublicHearingPresenterAdverseImpactNon-VolunteeringPermissibilityObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Non-Volunteering Adverse Impacts Public Hearing Developer F" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case94:Engineer_A_Competing_Public_Goods_Balanced_Disclosure_Assessment_BER_Present_Case,
case94:Engineer_A_Faithful_Agent_Developer_F_Public_Hearing_Presentation,
case94:Engineer_A_NSPE_Code_Conformance_Public_Testimony_Waterfront_Development,
case94:Engineer_A_Non-Concealment_Public_Welfare_Impact_Waterfront_Development_Presentation ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case94:Client_vs._Public_Interest_Tension_in_Public_Hearing_Presentation,
case94:Engineer_A_Traffic_Noise_Air_Pollution_Disclosure_Relevance_Determination ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case94:Engineer_A_Competing_Public_Goods_Balanced_Disclosure_Assessment_BER_Present_Case ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A presents the waterfront development project to the City Planning Board, highlighting environmental benefits of converting industrial waterfront to parkland, but does not volunteer known adverse traffic, noise, and air pollution impacts because the Board did not specifically question Engineer A on these factors." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case94:Relevance_and_Pertinence_Standard_Invoked_by_Engineer_A_at_City_X_Public_Hearing ;
proeth:discoveredincase "94" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T20:41:56.542419+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "94" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T20:41:56.542419+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Client-Retained Public Hearing Presenter Adverse Impact Non-Volunteering Permissibility Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A, retained by Developer F, was not ethically required to volunteer known traffic, noise, and air pollution impacts to the City Planning Board when not directly questioned, provided the presentation did not affirmatively mislead the Board and Engineer A answered all direct questions completely and honestly." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A is aware of these factors, but was not specifically questioned on these factors and does not volunteer this fact." ;
proeth:temporalscope "During the public hearing presentation before the City Planning Board" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A is aware of these factors, but was not specifically questioned on these factors and does not volunteer this fact.",
"Had Engineer A been questioned by the City Planning Board, Engineer A would have provided testimony concerning these issues." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 94 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T20:55:42.362051"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 94 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
94
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-28T20:41:56.542419+00:00
First case
94
Generated
2026-02-28T20:41:56.542419+00:00
Attributed to
Case 94 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T20:55:42.362051
Generated by
ProEthica Case 94 Extraction