Engineer A Traffic Noise Air Pollution Disclosure Relevance Determination
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#Engineer_A_Traffic_Noise_Air_Pollution_Disclosure_Relevance_Determination
Properties
Instance of
Third-PartyEnvironmentalImpactDisclosureRelevanceContestedState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Third-PartyEnvironmentalImpactDisclosureRelevanceContestedState
Active period
From Engineer A's awareness of the traffic/noise/air pollution impacts through completion of the public presentation
Affected parties
Affected third parties (traffic/noise/pollution impacts)
Engineer A
General public
Public body receiving testimony
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer A's obligation to determine whether anticipated traffic, noise, and air pollution impacts from a commercial development are 'relevant and pertinent' information requiring disclosure in a public body presentation
Terminated by
Engineer A's professional judgment determination on relevance and completion of the public presentation
Triggering event
Engineer A's knowledge that the anticipated commercial development will significantly increase traffic, noise, and air pollution, combined with a presentation obligation before a public body
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
the question is whether the traffic, noise, and air pollution issues are 'relevant and pertinent information'
Text references
Engineer A's ethical obligation does not require him to disclose such information if, in his professional judgment, it is not 'relevant and pertinent'
If they are 'relevant and pertinent,' the engineer has an obligation to disclose the information in any presentation made on the project
the present case involves the potential obligation of a single engineer to disclose the fact that an anticipated commercial development will significantly increase traffic, as well as noise and air pollution
the question is whether the traffic, noise, and air pollution issues are 'relevant and pertinent information'
TTL
@prefix case94: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case94:Engineer_A_Traffic_Noise_Air_Pollution_Disclosure_Relevance_Determination a proeth:Third-PartyEnvironmentalImpactDisclosureRelevanceContestedState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Traffic Noise Air Pollution Disclosure Relevance Determination" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From Engineer A's awareness of the traffic/noise/air pollution impacts through completion of the public presentation" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Affected third parties (traffic/noise/pollution impacts)",
"Engineer A",
"General public",
"Public body receiving testimony" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "94" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T18:50:51.550868+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "94" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T18:50:51.550868+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "the question is whether the traffic, noise, and air pollution issues are 'relevant and pertinent information'" ;
proeth:stateclass "Third-Party Environmental Impact Disclosure Relevance Contested State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A's obligation to determine whether anticipated traffic, noise, and air pollution impacts from a commercial development are 'relevant and pertinent' information requiring disclosure in a public body presentation" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Engineer A's professional judgment determination on relevance and completion of the public presentation" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A's ethical obligation does not require him to disclose such information if, in his professional judgment, it is not 'relevant and pertinent'",
"If they are 'relevant and pertinent,' the engineer has an obligation to disclose the information in any presentation made on the project",
"the present case involves the potential obligation of a single engineer to disclose the fact that an anticipated commercial development will significantly increase traffic, as well as noise and air pollution",
"the question is whether the traffic, noise, and air pollution issues are 'relevant and pertinent information'" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer A's knowledge that the anticipated commercial development will significantly increase traffic, noise, and air pollution, combined with a presentation obligation before a public body" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 94 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T19:13:05.757256"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 94 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
94
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T18:50:51.550868+00:00
First case
94
Generated
2026-02-28T18:50:51.550868+00:00
Attributed to
Case 94 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T19:13:05.757256
Generated by
ProEthica Case 94 Extraction