City Planning Board City Planning Board Regulatory Authority
R · Role
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#City_Planning_Board_City_Planning_Board_Regulatory_Authority
Definition
The municipal regulatory body before which Engineer A presents the waterfront development design. The Board questions Engineer A and ultimately receives testimony from other witnesses about traffic, noise, and air pollution impacts not volunteered by Engineer A.
Properties
Instance of
CityPlanningBoardRegulatoryAuthority
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CityPlanningBoardRegulatoryAuthority
Attributes
| jurisdiction | City X |
| function | Development project approval via public hearing |
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Relationships
| type | receives_testimony_from |
| target | Engineer A |
| type | receives_testimony_from |
| target | Other Hearing Witnesses |
| type | regulatory_authority_over |
| target | Developer F |
Role category
public_responsibility
Relationships
adheresToPrinciple
Comparative Case Precedent Distinguishing Present Case From BER 65-9 and 79-2, Informed Decision-Making Enablement Obligation Invoked for City Planning Board, Informed Decision-Making Enablement Obligation Tension at City X Public Hearing, Informed Decision Making Enablement City Planning Board Waterfront Development, Multi-Witness Hearing Institutional Completeness — Present Case City Planning Board, Public Hearing Multi-Witness Process as Institutional Completeness Mechanism Invoked in Developer F Hearing, Public Policy Engineering Debate Open Resolution Invoked in Waterfront Development Hearing, Public Welfare Paramount Invoked in Waterfront Development Hearing
Source Evidence
Source text
present the proposed design for the City X waterfront to the City Planning Board
Text references
Had Engineer A been questioned by the City Planning Board
present the proposed design for the City X waterfront to the City Planning Board
responds to questions by members of the City Planning Board
TTL
@prefix case94: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case94:City_Planning_Board_City_Planning_Board_Regulatory_Authority a proeth:CityPlanningBoardRegulatoryAuthority,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "City Planning Board City Planning Board Regulatory Authority" ;
proeth-core:adheresToPrinciple case94:Comparative_Case_Precedent_Distinguishing_Present_Case_From_BER_65-9_and_79-2,
case94:Informed_Decision-Making_Enablement_Obligation_Invoked_for_City_Planning_Board,
case94:Informed_Decision-Making_Enablement_Obligation_Tension_at_City_X_Public_Hearing,
case94:Informed_Decision_Making_Enablement_City_Planning_Board_Waterfront_Development,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#Multi-Witness_Hearing_Institutional_Completeness_—_Present_Case_City_Planning_Board>,
case94:Public_Hearing_Multi-Witness_Process_as_Institutional_Completeness_Mechanism_Invoked_in_Developer_F_Hearing,
case94:Public_Policy_Engineering_Debate_Open_Resolution_Invoked_in_Waterfront_Development_Hearing,
case94:Public_Welfare_Paramount_Invoked_in_Waterfront_Development_Hearing ;
proeth:attributes "{'jurisdiction': 'City X', 'function': 'Development project approval via public hearing'}" ;
proeth:caseinvolvement "The municipal regulatory body before which Engineer A presents the waterfront development design. The Board questions Engineer A and ultimately receives testimony from other witnesses about traffic, noise, and air pollution impacts not volunteered by Engineer A." ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "94" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T18:49:29.460591+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "94" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T18:49:29.460591+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:relationships "{'type': 'receives_testimony_from', 'target': 'Engineer A'}",
"{'type': 'receives_testimony_from', 'target': 'Other Hearing Witnesses'}",
"{'type': 'regulatory_authority_over', 'target': 'Developer F'}" ;
proeth:rolecategory "public_responsibility" ;
proeth:roleclass "City Planning Board Regulatory Authority" ;
proeth:sourcetext "present the proposed design for the City X waterfront to the City Planning Board" ;
proeth:textreferences "Had Engineer A been questioned by the City Planning Board",
"present the proposed design for the City X waterfront to the City Planning Board",
"responds to questions by members of the City Planning Board" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 94 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T19:13:05.759904"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 94 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
94
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-28T18:49:29.460591+00:00
First case
94
Generated
2026-02-28T18:49:29.460591+00:00
Attributed to
Case 94 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T19:13:05.759904
Generated by
ProEthica Case 94 Extraction