Informed Decision-Making Enablement Obligation Invoked for City Planning Board
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#Informed_Decision-Making_Enablement_Obligation_Invoked_for_City_Planning_Board
Properties
Instance of
InformedDecision-MakingEnablementObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#InformedDecision-MakingEnablementObligation
Applied to
City Planning Board's decision on Developer F's waterfront development project
Balancing with
Faithful Agent Obligation Within Ethical Limits
Public Hearing Multi-Witness Process as Institutional Completeness Mechanism
Relevance and Pertinence Standard for Voluntary Disclosure at Public Hearings
Concrete expression
The City Planning Board, as the public regulatory decision-making body, requires complete information about the waterfront development project — including both its environmental benefits and its adverse traffic, noise, and pollution impacts — to exercise genuinely informed judgment on Developer F's project approval.
Confidence
0.85
Importance
high
Interpretation
The obligation to enable informed decision-making is satisfied at the hearing level through the combined testimony of Engineer A and other witnesses; the question is whether Engineer A individually bore the obligation to supply the adverse information or whether the hearing process as a whole satisfies it.
Invoked by
City Planning Board City Planning Board Regulatory Authority
Tension resolution
The informed decision-making obligation is fulfilled by the hearing process as a whole; the Planning Board receives complete information through the multi-witness testimony structure, even though Engineer A did not individually volunteer all adverse impacts.
Source Evidence
Source text
Later, other witnesses attending the public hearing (including other engineers) testify about the increased traffic, noise, and air pollution issues.
Text references
But it is also true the anticipated commercial development could increase traffic, as well as air and noise pollution.
Engineer A makes a presentation and responds to questions by members of the City Planning Board.
Later, other witnesses attending the public hearing (including other engineers) testify about the increased traffic, noise, and air pollution issues.
TTL
@prefix case94: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case94:Informed_Decision-Making_Enablement_Obligation_Invoked_for_City_Planning_Board a proeth:InformedDecision-MakingEnablementObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Informed Decision-Making Enablement Obligation Invoked for City Planning Board" ;
proeth:appliedto "City Planning Board's decision on Developer F's waterfront development project" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Faithful Agent Obligation Within Ethical Limits",
"Public Hearing Multi-Witness Process as Institutional Completeness Mechanism",
"Relevance and Pertinence Standard for Voluntary Disclosure at Public Hearings" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "The City Planning Board, as the public regulatory decision-making body, requires complete information about the waterfront development project — including both its environmental benefits and its adverse traffic, noise, and pollution impacts — to exercise genuinely informed judgment on Developer F's project approval." ;
proeth:confidence "0.85" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "94" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T20:40:19.193187+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "94" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T20:40:19.193187+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "The obligation to enable informed decision-making is satisfied at the hearing level through the combined testimony of Engineer A and other witnesses; the question is whether Engineer A individually bore the obligation to supply the adverse information or whether the hearing process as a whole satisfies it." ;
proeth:invokedby "City Planning Board City Planning Board Regulatory Authority" ;
proeth:principleclass "Informed Decision-Making Enablement Obligation" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Later, other witnesses attending the public hearing (including other engineers) testify about the increased traffic, noise, and air pollution issues." ;
proeth:tensionresolution "The informed decision-making obligation is fulfilled by the hearing process as a whole; the Planning Board receives complete information through the multi-witness testimony structure, even though Engineer A did not individually volunteer all adverse impacts." ;
proeth:textreferences "But it is also true the anticipated commercial development could increase traffic, as well as air and noise pollution.",
"Engineer A makes a presentation and responds to questions by members of the City Planning Board.",
"Later, other witnesses attending the public hearing (including other engineers) testify about the increased traffic, noise, and air pollution issues." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 94 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T20:55:42.365714"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 94 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
94
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-28T20:40:19.193187+00:00
First case
94
Generated
2026-02-28T20:40:19.193187+00:00
Attributed to
Case 94 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T20:55:42.365714
Generated by
ProEthica Case 94 Extraction