Engineer A Genuine Project Withdrawal Non-Substitution Sanitary System
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/92#Engineer_A_Genuine_Project_Withdrawal_Non-Substitution_Sanitary_System
Properties
Instance of
GenuineProjectWithdrawalNon-SubstitutionbyResponsibilityDisclaimerObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#GenuineProjectWithdrawalNon-SubstitutionbyResponsibilityDisclaimerObligation
Case context
After Administrator C removed Engineer A from formal responsibility for the sanitary system and assigned Technician B, Engineer A declared she assumed no responsibility for the plant and beds — which the Board found insufficient as a withdrawal from further service.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A (City Engineer/Director of Public Works)
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to genuinely withdraw from further service on the sanitary system project rather than merely declaring she assumed no responsibility for the plant and beds, because the latter did not constitute the withdrawal required by the NSPE Code when public safety was endangered.
Temporal scope
Upon recognition that internal authorities would not act on safety concerns and that public safety was endangered
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Administrator-Ordered Responsible Charge Transfer to Technician B, Public Safety at Risk from Sanitary System Overflow
derivedFromPrinciple
Project Withdrawal Obligation Applied to Engineer A Sanitary System Disengagement
Source Evidence
Source text
Nor do we believe, Engineer A's decision to assume no responsibility for the plant and beds constitutes a 'withdrawal from further service on the project.'
Text references
Nor do we believe, Engineer A's decision to assume no responsibility for the plant and beds constitutes a 'withdrawal from further service on the project.'
the Code only requires that the engineer withdraw from a project and report to proper authorities when the circumstances involve endangerment to the public safety, health and welfare
TTL
@prefix case92: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/92#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case92:Engineer_A_Genuine_Project_Withdrawal_Non-Substitution_Sanitary_System a proeth:GenuineProjectWithdrawalNon-SubstitutionbyResponsibilityDisclaimerObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Genuine Project Withdrawal Non-Substitution Sanitary System" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case92:Engineer_A_Covert_Advisory_Continuation_to_Technician_B ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case92:Administrator-Ordered_Responsible_Charge_Transfer_to_Technician_B,
case92:Public_Safety_at_Risk_from_Sanitary_System_Overflow ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case92:Engineer_A_Covert_Advisory_Continuation_to_Technician_B ;
proeth:casecontext "After Administrator C removed Engineer A from formal responsibility for the sanitary system and assigned Technician B, Engineer A declared she assumed no responsibility for the plant and beds — which the Board found insufficient as a withdrawal from further service." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case92:Project_Withdrawal_Obligation_Applied_to_Engineer_A_Sanitary_System_Disengagement ;
proeth:discoveredincase "92" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T13:49:27.059210+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "92" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T13:49:27.059210+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (City Engineer/Director of Public Works)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Genuine Project Withdrawal Non-Substitution by Responsibility Disclaimer Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to genuinely withdraw from further service on the sanitary system project rather than merely declaring she assumed no responsibility for the plant and beds, because the latter did not constitute the withdrawal required by the NSPE Code when public safety was endangered." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Nor do we believe, Engineer A's decision to assume no responsibility for the plant and beds constitutes a 'withdrawal from further service on the project.'" ;
proeth:temporalscope "Upon recognition that internal authorities would not act on safety concerns and that public safety was endangered" ;
proeth:textreferences "Nor do we believe, Engineer A's decision to assume no responsibility for the plant and beds constitutes a 'withdrawal from further service on the project.'",
"the Code only requires that the engineer withdraw from a project and report to proper authorities when the circumstances involve endangerment to the public safety, health and welfare" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 92 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T14:00:16.265155"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 92 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
92
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T13:49:27.059210+00:00
First case
92
Generated
2026-03-01T13:49:27.059210+00:00
Attributed to
Case 92 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T14:00:16.265155
Generated by
ProEthica Case 92 Extraction