Project Withdrawal Obligation Applied to Engineer A Sanitary System Disengagement
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/92#Project_Withdrawal_Obligation_Applied_to_Engineer_A_Sanitary_System_Disengagement
Properties
Instance of
ProjectWithdrawalasEthicalRecourseWhenSafetyStandardsRejected
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ProjectWithdrawalasEthicalRecourseWhenSafetyStandardsRejected
Applied to
Engineer A's informal disengagement from sanitary system responsibility
NSPE Code withdrawal requirement
Balancing with
Loyal
Public Welfare Paramount
Concrete expression
Engineer A's decision to 'assume no responsibility' for the plant and beds did not constitute adequate withdrawal from further service on the project as required by the Code; proper withdrawal requires affirmative disengagement and reporting, not merely informal assumption of non-responsibility.
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Interpretation
In this context, withdrawal from further service requires affirmative, formal disengagement accompanied by reporting to proper authorities — informal assumption of non-responsibility does not satisfy the ethical withdrawal obligation.
Invoked by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Tension resolution
The withdrawal obligation is not satisfied by informal distancing; it requires affirmative action that includes both disengagement and reporting to proper authorities.
Source Evidence
Source text
Nor do we believe, Engineer A's decision to assume no responsibility for the plant and beds constitutes a 'withdrawal from further service on the project.'
Text references
Nor do we believe, Engineer A's decision to assume no responsibility for the plant and beds constitutes a 'withdrawal from further service on the project.'
the Code only requires that the engineer withdraw from a project and report to proper authorities when the circumstances involve endangerment to the public safety, health and welfare.
TTL
@prefix case92: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/92#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case92:Project_Withdrawal_Obligation_Applied_to_Engineer_A_Sanitary_System_Disengagement a proeth:ProjectWithdrawalasEthicalRecourseWhenSafetyStandardsRejected,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Project Withdrawal Obligation Applied to Engineer A Sanitary System Disengagement" ;
proeth:appliedto "Engineer A's informal disengagement from sanitary system responsibility",
"NSPE Code withdrawal requirement" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Loyal",
"Public Welfare Paramount" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "Engineer A's decision to 'assume no responsibility' for the plant and beds did not constitute adequate withdrawal from further service on the project as required by the Code; proper withdrawal requires affirmative disengagement and reporting, not merely informal assumption of non-responsibility." ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "92" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T13:46:19.188677+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "92" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T13:46:19.188677+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "In this context, withdrawal from further service requires affirmative, formal disengagement accompanied by reporting to proper authorities — informal assumption of non-responsibility does not satisfy the ethical withdrawal obligation." ;
proeth:invokedby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review" ;
proeth:principleclass "Project Withdrawal as Ethical Recourse When Safety Standards Rejected" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Nor do we believe, Engineer A's decision to assume no responsibility for the plant and beds constitutes a 'withdrawal from further service on the project.'" ;
proeth:tensionresolution "The withdrawal obligation is not satisfied by informal distancing; it requires affirmative action that includes both disengagement and reporting to proper authorities." ;
proeth:textreferences "Nor do we believe, Engineer A's decision to assume no responsibility for the plant and beds constitutes a 'withdrawal from further service on the project.'",
"the Code only requires that the engineer withdraw from a project and report to proper authorities when the circumstances involve endangerment to the public safety, health and welfare." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 92 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T14:00:16.248702"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 92 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
92
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T13:46:19.188677+00:00
First case
92
Generated
2026-03-01T13:46:19.188677+00:00
Attributed to
Case 92 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T14:00:16.248702
Generated by
ProEthica Case 92 Extraction