Client Economic Interest Displacing Engineer Primary Safety Obligation
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/89#Client_Economic_Interest_Displacing_Engineer_Primary_Safety_Obligation
Properties
Instance of
Client-Interestvs.Public-InterestOpenConflictState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Client-Interestvs.Public-InterestOpenConflictState
Active period
From client's cost objection through Engineer A's acquiescence and project continuation
Affected parties
Client
Engineer A
General Public
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Subject
Tension between client's cost-reduction interest and Engineer A's paramount obligation to protect public health and safety
Terminated by
Not resolved — the conflict persisted and Engineer A resolved it incorrectly in favor of client economic interests
Triggering event
Client's cost concerns caused Engineer A to subordinate the primary public safety obligation to client economic preferences
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A acted in a manner that suggests that the primary obligation was not the public but the client's economic concerns
Text references
Engineer A abandoned the ethical duty and proceeded with work on the project
Engineer A acted in a manner that suggests that the primary obligation was not the public but the client's economic concerns
Section II.1.a. admonishes engineers to recognize that their primary obligation is to protect the public safety, health, property, and welfare
TTL
@prefix case89: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/89#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case89:Client_Economic_Interest_Displacing_Engineer_Primary_Safety_Obligation a proeth:Client-Interestvs.Public-InterestOpenConflictState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Client Economic Interest Displacing Engineer Primary Safety Obligation" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From client's cost objection through Engineer A's acquiescence and project continuation" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Client",
"Engineer A",
"General Public" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "89" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T18:08:00.591720+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "89" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T18:08:00.591720+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A acted in a manner that suggests that the primary obligation was not the public but the client's economic concerns" ;
proeth:stateclass "Client-Interest vs. Public-Interest Open Conflict State" ;
proeth:subject "Tension between client's cost-reduction interest and Engineer A's paramount obligation to protect public health and safety" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Not resolved — the conflict persisted and Engineer A resolved it incorrectly in favor of client economic interests" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A abandoned the ethical duty and proceeded with work on the project",
"Engineer A acted in a manner that suggests that the primary obligation was not the public but the client's economic concerns",
"Section II.1.a. admonishes engineers to recognize that their primary obligation is to protect the public safety, health, property, and welfare" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Client's cost concerns caused Engineer A to subordinate the primary public safety obligation to client economic preferences" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 89 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T18:38:27.066689"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 89 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
89
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-01T18:08:00.591720+00:00
First case
89
Generated
2026-03-01T18:08:00.591720+00:00
Attributed to
Case 89 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T18:38:27.066689
Generated by
ProEthica Case 89 Extraction