Confirmed Construction Risk Without Adequate Safeguards
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/89#Confirmed_Construction_Risk_Without_Adequate_Safeguards
Properties
Instance of
ConfirmedRiskWithoutAdequateSafeguardsState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ConfirmedRiskWithoutAdequateSafeguardsState
Active period
From client's refusal of the safety representative through project construction
Affected parties
Client
Construction workers
Engineer A
Public
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Subject
Active construction-phase danger identified by Engineer A, with client having refused the recommended protective measure
Terminated by
Client reversal, Engineer A disassociation, or alternative safeguard implementation
Triggering event
Client refuses to hire on-site representative despite Engineer A's documented safety recommendation
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
Because of the potentially dangerous nature of implementing the design during the construction phase, Engineer A recommends to the client that a full-time, on-site project representative be hired
Text references
Because of the potentially dangerous nature of implementing the design during the construction phase, Engineer A recommends to the client that a full-time, on-site project representative be hired
the client indicates to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired
TTL
@prefix case89: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/89#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case89:Confirmed_Construction_Risk_Without_Adequate_Safeguards a proeth:ConfirmedRiskWithoutAdequateSafeguardsState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Confirmed Construction Risk Without Adequate Safeguards" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From client's refusal of the safety representative through project construction" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Client",
"Construction workers",
"Engineer A",
"Public" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "89" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T18:07:12.075933+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "89" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T18:07:12.075933+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Because of the potentially dangerous nature of implementing the design during the construction phase, Engineer A recommends to the client that a full-time, on-site project representative be hired" ;
proeth:stateclass "Confirmed Risk Without Adequate Safeguards State" ;
proeth:subject "Active construction-phase danger identified by Engineer A, with client having refused the recommended protective measure" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Client reversal, Engineer A disassociation, or alternative safeguard implementation" ;
proeth:textreferences "Because of the potentially dangerous nature of implementing the design during the construction phase, Engineer A recommends to the client that a full-time, on-site project representative be hired",
"the client indicates to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Client refuses to hire on-site representative despite Engineer A's documented safety recommendation" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 89 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T18:38:27.064481"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 89 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
89
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T18:07:12.075933+00:00
First case
89
Generated
2026-03-01T18:07:12.075933+00:00
Attributed to
Case 89 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T18:38:27.064481
Generated by
ProEthica Case 89 Extraction